Search for: "Handy v. Superior Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 44
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2024, 6:42 pm
Garcia v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 10:26 am
The Court took note of Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:03 pm
Turner v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:16 am
On September 8, 2010, the Superior Court judge granted the City's motion to dismiss and PLEA appealed. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:50 am
The United States Supreme Court recently held in Heien v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
Superior Court (1984) 161 CA 3d 151, 167-168 (pdf), family members Jones v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
Superior Court (1984) 161 CA 3d 151, 167-168 (pdf), family members Jones v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 6:02 am
And as Lawrence v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 7:56 am
The Administrative Office of the Courts purchased copies for superior and district court judges, appellate judges, district attorneys, and select AOC offices. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:26 am
Employers that punish employees for exercising their rights under this statute could face suit in Superior Court. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 11:28 am
Zarco Hotels Inc., Case No. 22STCV07447 (Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles) You can download a copy of the Court’s Order here. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 3:50 am
If the Ohio Supreme Court’s vacating the 8th District’s earlier decision in Alexander v. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:39 pm
Superior Court (1999) 20 Cal4th 1178. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm
(Docket Report) District Court Minnesota: Res judicata bars patent claims that could have been asserted in earlier trademark case involving the ‘Same technology and the same accused products’: Superior Industries, LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:52 am
Jones v. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 9:48 am
‘Policing’ Rest Breaks The California Supreme Court has consistently reinforced its holding in Brinker Restaurant Corp v. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 1:58 am
There's no justification for not licensing automotive suppliers, especially not under the CJEU's Huawei v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:05 am
This is true of Case C 190/10 Génesis Seguros Generales Sociedad Anónima de Seguros y Reaseguros (Génesis) v Boys Toys Sa, Administración Del Estado, a ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union (First Chamber) on 21 March, a reference for a preliminary ruling which will fascinate trade mark applicants, their professional advisers and to all true clock-watchers. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm
Lexis 93520, at *104 (citing another district court case and a Superior Court case from 1984).We don’t know of any cases excepting state statutory schemes from fundamental Erie/federalism principles, and allowing more adventure [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 6:00 am
Superior Court (1981) 118 Cal.App.3d 761. [read post]
