Search for: "Happy-Kat Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2017, 9:55 am
While the current number might be only 20% better than chance, it will no doubt improve.Kenichi Nagasawa, Head of IP at Canon Inc, focused on the allied area of the “Internet of Things”. [read post]
3 May 2015, 10:33 pm
* Proprietor may be unhappy because BE HAPPY is not a trade markCan one be happy with a “BE HAPPY” trade mark? [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:41 am
As Shalini Bengani explains in this post,TufAmerica Inc v W B Music Corp 13-cv-7847(LAK), decided by the US District Court for the Southern District of New York, is another one of those cases. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 7:57 am
Mr Justice Kitchen, sitting in the Court of Appeal with Lord Justice Jacob and Longmore, dismissed the appeal in the case of Softlanding Systems Inc v KDP Software Limited and Unicom Systems Inc ([2010] EWCA Civ 1172) last week. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 2:54 am
Normally the IPKat is happy to leave recently-departed guest Kats to their own devices after they have had a six-month stint on this weblog, to give them a chance to recover, but one of the most recent guest Kats, who provided us with this post only last Sunday on whether merely offering a service constitutes the use of a trade mark under the Lanham Act, is back in action once again. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 6:12 am
This decision didn't seem to make anyone very happy, so both parties appealed. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:06 am
Runberg, Inc. d/b/a Zephyrs v McDermott, Will & Emery LLP and Bernard P. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:01 am
Of Judge and Jura-prudenceJeremy reports on Whyte & MacKay Ltd v Origin Wine UK Ltd and Dolce Co Invest Inc [2015] EWHC 1271 (Ch), a decision where Mr Justice Arnold of the Chancery Division, England and Wales, addressed the possible likelihood of confusion between JURA ORIGIN for "Scotch whisky and Scotch whisky-based liqueurs produced in Scotland" and ORIGIN and ORIGINS earlier marks.* Three aspects of information: a new eventJeremy presents "Three… [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Kat Eleonora Rosati writes about the Cambridge summer school devoted to all things IP. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 2:05 am
The post A Proud HR Community: Happy Pride 2023! [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 2:05 am
The post A Proud HR Community: Happy Pride 2023! [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Alex Woolgar posts No interim injunction for copyright infringement => not a Happy Camper. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
Last week our Kats published articles in several different areas of IP law and even beyond! [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
Red roses are those which are included both in UK Labour and Scottish Labour Party’s trade marks, with the first not so happy with the second using a red rose, so that a dispute arose. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons presents his fourth instalment [previously: here, here, here] of the Retromark trade mark litigation round up.This time around we have eight worthy UK and EU cases for you, including some big hitters in the form of Cartier, Louboutin and – because Retromark wouldn’t be complete without one – the latest round of theKit Kat saga. 1. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
That was the opening sentence of Mr Justice Arnold's judgment in Interflora, Inc. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 3:05 am
Inspired by Mrs Kat, in turn inspired by an article posted on Yahoo! [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 6:47 am
Kat in black-and-whiteFinally that day has now come.In a case before the Patents and Market Court of Appeals about the validity in Sweden of an international trade mark designating Sweden held by ContextLogic Inc, the court found that the outcome of the case depended entirely on whether the traditional maximalist Swedish view was workable in the light of Specsavers (my translation):If the (black and white, my addition) international registration should be considered to… [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:56 am
.* Falling off cliffs and clutching at straws: a new event on pharma patent extensionsJeremy lets his Kat readership know all about C5's annual Pharmaceutical Patent Term Extensions Forum, a two-day event subtitled "Maximising pharmaceutical patent lifecycles to foster innovation and growth". [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
, Inc v Jen, Chi [2019] SGIPOS 3. [read post]
