Search for: "Harding v. Carr"
Results 21 - 40
of 115
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2010, 3:38 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California have recently released decisions on labor cases among them: Carr v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 8:42 am
Adding a soupçon of nominal confusion here is Carr v. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 10:51 am
We observe that at least some law students seem to find it hard to engage in depth with long documents. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 12:14 am
Google with a couple of class actions over the Play Store (Carr v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 11:48 am
.* Storm in a C Cup: Mr Justice Carr refuses injunction and account of profits in Stretchline v H&M spatElettra Bietti (A&O) summarises for the Kat-readership the recent and unreported decision of Mr Justice Carr in the on-going Stretchline v H&M dispute [see previous posts here], which serves as a warning for all those who draft IP settlement agreements in the event of future infringements.* Pharmaceuticals, Fig Leaves and Accidental… [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 4:37 pm
On August 21, 2023, the California Supreme Court’s decision in Raines v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:20 am
Carr of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio issued an opinion in Vance v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 6:18 am
” At More Soft Money Hard Law, Bob Bauer weighs in on Justice v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 12:40 am
Read the opinion in Pannu v. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 11:07 am
DesignsRosie Burbidge published her last post as an official GuestKat, providing a tour of some recent design decisions, including Tynan v J4K Sports Ltd [2018] EWHC 3519 and Pulseon OY v Garmin (Europe) Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 138. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 1:06 pm
The court addressed who owned what copyright in computer software developed by a service provider, but where the express contractual provisions left a lacuna as to IPR ownership.Annsley Merelle Ward reviews the ex tempore decision of Mr Justice Carr in Evalve & Abbott v Edwards Lifesciences [2019] EWHC 1158. [read post]
1 Jun 2008, 1:43 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 11:13 pm
In the wake of this trend, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in Brannum v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
Chief Judge Carr, of the N.D. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 5:09 am
Carr, the one-man-one-vote case; and was generally viewed as the leader of the Court's conservative faction.Of course, what is meant by "conservative" in this context is sometimes hard to parse. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 10:54 am
However, the answer to the question whether political-gerrymandering claims are justiciable is not that hard. [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
Rosie Burbidge reports on the Invista v Botes saga. [read post]
5 May 2022, 5:30 am
Carr (the apportionment case one man [woman]/one vote), West Coast Hotel (states can regulate business), Miranda v. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 5:54 pm
More on that later if the AmeriKat feels inspired to weave her way through a costs judgment…as important as they are.Permission to Appeal: Appeal was granted to Huawei on the global licensing issue, hard edged non-discrimination and on Huawei v ZTE. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 4:43 am
Manara explained the inception of the early litigation against eBay and Google as the high water mark of third party liability in France – Hermès v eBay, Dior v eBay, etc. [read post]
