Search for: "Harding v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc."
Results 21 - 40
of 92
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., — F. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:41 am
“Woman Sues Adidas After Fall She Blames on Sticky Shoes” [Lowering the Bar] Texas lawmakers file loser pays proposals [SE Tex Record] Actual scope of proposals hard to discern through funhouse lens of NYT reporting [PoL] Marie Gryphon testimony on loser-pays proposals in Arkansas [Manhattan Institute, related] Google awarded patent on changing of logo for special days [Engadget via Coyote] “Civil Gideon in Deadbeat Dad Cases Would Be ‘Massive’ Change,… [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 11:51 am
The Supreme Court held in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:57 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 9:48 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 245 F.R.D. 358, 376 (E.D. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:50 am
The opinion is interesting in that it contains a detailed examination of certification requirements pursuant to Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 11:37 am
Just two years ago, in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 11:41 am
Wal Mart Stores Inc., 691 F.3d 527 (3d Cir. 2012); Myers v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 11:06 am
Citing the decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 8:00 am
Although the court started its analysis with the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 9:13 pm
In its subsequent decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:57 am
The Eighth Circuit, in a 2:1 decision, upheld that verdict, rejecting arguments by the employer that (1) the case should never have been certified given differences in time spent among the class; (2) the use of statistics was improper and constituted “Trial by Formula” in violation of the teachings of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 9:01 am
Doubling down on the point, the Court emphasized that its 2011 decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 9:01 pm
" Forbes.com, 10/17/00 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:14 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 725 F.3d 349, 355 (3d Cir. 2013), and Carrera, the Third Circuit established a two-part test for ascertainability: (1) the class must be defined with reference to objective criteria, and (2) there must be a reliable and administratively feasible mechanism for determining whether putative class members fall within the class definition. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:14 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 725 F.3d 349, 355 (3d Cir. 2013), and Carrera, the Third Circuit established a two-part test for ascertainability: (1) the class must be defined with reference to objective criteria, and (2) there must be a reliable and administratively feasible mechanism for determining whether putative class members fall within the class definition. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:57 pm
Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED for further consideration in light of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 10:05 am
Wal-Mart, Inc., 222 F.R.D. 137, 184-185 (N.D. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 8:08 pm
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 2009 WL 1067018 (D. [read post]
29 Mar 2013, 8:27 am
The bell-weather case in that regard is Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
