Search for: "Hardy v. Doe"
Results 21 - 40
of 331
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2023, 3:51 am
Although the complaint does not allege any cognizable pecuniary damage to decedent’s estate, plaintiff Hardie Stevens’s affidavit corrects that deficiency by identifying several categories of damages to the estate, including increased taxes and legal fees (see Estate of Schneider v Finmann, 15 NY3d 306, 309-310 [2010]; Rudolf, 8 NY3d at 443; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]). [read post]
13 May 2023, 7:30 am
FTC * New Jersey Attorney Ethics Opinion Blesses Competitive Keyword Advertising (…or Does It?) [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:30 am
Comeaux (left) with friends Trey Hardy and Galen Hicks at Soulard Mardi Gras. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
For services that are “of a type” offered and sold competitively in substantial quantities in the commercial marketplace, the contracting officer must determine that the offeror has submitted sufficient information to evaluate price reasonableness through price analysis.[38] For DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, minor modifications to commercial products that do not change the commercial product to other than commercial are exempt from the requirement to submit certified cost or pricing… [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
IPSO 11161-22 Park’s of Hamilton Limited v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 11822-21 Law v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02114-22 Bird v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11120-22 Cozens-Hardy v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11319-22… [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:39 am
[Government officials] are to be treated as "men of fortitude, able to thrive in a hardy climate" …. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 10:41 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 8:07 am
Hardy, M.D. 95 (1983); “Harriet Hardy’s Views on Asbestos Issues” (Mar. 13, 2013). [11] Richard L. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
This list does not attempt to include all important decisions of those two courts that were rendered in 2022. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 11:57 am
In re Hardy, 787 F.3d 1189, 1192 (8th Cir. 2015); accord Law v. [read post]
18 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Yet, as Bush v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 8:54 am
Yini Liu: Does Innovation Success Reduce the Cost of Financing? [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 6:53 am
FTC * New Jersey Attorney Ethics Opinion Blesses Competitive Keyword Advertising (…or Does It?) [read post]
15 Nov 2022, 4:13 am
Ethics Comm. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 6:07 pm
For more, see the opinion (Netflix, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:15 am
Not only does the film have one of the greatest titles in movie history, it features the first official motion picture appearance of comedy duo Laurel and Hardy. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
Just referencing a trademark on the Internet does not support a trademark claim, full stop. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 7:34 am
James Hardie * Ano [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:40 am
Thus, §33-28-1 does not provide Mary K. [read post]
