Search for: "Hardy v. State of Florida"
Results 21 - 40
of 87
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2019, 7:05 am
Perfect Body Image * The Florida Bar Regulates, But Doesn’t Ban, Competitive Keyword Ads * Rounding Up Three Recent Keyword Advertising Cases–Comphy v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am
Perfect Body Image * The Florida Bar Regulates, But Doesn’t Ban, Competitive Keyword Ads * Rounding Up Three Recent Keyword Advertising Cases–Comphy v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 4:01 pm
* Florida Allows Competitive Keyword Advertising By Lawyers * Another Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Unceremoniously Dismissed–Infostream v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am
” Tichy v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
The only difference here is that, instead of Peninsula’s search results directly stating the name Peninsula, they include the part name. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am
In support of that conclusion, the court makes this murky statement: “courts in this Circuit have repeatedly held that a plaintiff may state a claim under the Lanham Act where the defendant (1) interfered with the plaintiff’s ability to offer its own commercial services, and/or (2) used the Internet. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 2:55 am
Last week, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit decided Resnick v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 1:25 pm
United States, 48 F. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 9:13 am
* Florida Allows Competitive Keyword Advertising By Lawyers * Another Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Unceremoniously Dismissed–Infostream v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 12:25 pm
* Florida Allows Competitive Keyword Advertising By Lawyers * Another Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Unceremoniously Dismissed–Infostream v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:22 pm
Hardy v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:11 am
United States, 17-6664, Hardy v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 11:57 pm
LIGHTBOURNE August 13,2007VIA FEDERAL EXPRESSTangy Hardy, Docket Clerk:Clerk of the Florida Supreme Court500 South Duval StreetTallahassee, FL 32399-1 927: Ian Deco Lightbourne v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 2:09 pm
Hardy v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 11:10 am
Hardy, 347 P.3d 222, 228 (Kan. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 11:10 am
Hardy, 347 P.3d 222, 228 (Kan. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 4:06 am
" See also Florida Dep't of Revenue v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:15 am
The principle that characters which evolve over time don’t enter the public domain all at once was established by the 2014 opinion in Klinger v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 1:32 pm
As stated in Playboy Enters., Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:15 pm
The rest of the crop are long-running state-on-top habeas relists involving claims that a court of appeals gave insufficient deference to state-court decisions: Hardy v. [read post]
