Search for: "Harley v. Harley" Results 21 - 40 of 266
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm by Adjunct LawProfs
Tony Serra, et al v Harley Lappin, Director, Bureau of Prisons, et al, U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, April 09, 2010, No. 08-15969 The U.S. [read post]
20 May 2007, 3:16 am
I like the fact that the Mini-Beast not only fits in the stock horn position, but it actually compliments the looks of the big V-Twin engine in the Harley. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 6:48 am by Sean Wajert
 In support of this position, Harley-Davidson relied primarily on Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., v. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 7:32 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Contract Law Opinions Body: Below are today's Contract law Appellate Court opinions:   AC30022, AC30163 - Harley v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 9:33 am by michael
Supreme Court Tomlinson & Ors v Birmingham City Council [2010] UKSC 8 (17 February 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Harley & Ors v Smith & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 78 (17 February 2010) Actavis UK Ltd v Novartis AG [2010] EWCA Civ 82 (17 February 2010) Davies & Anor, R (on the application of) v HM Revenue & Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 83 (16 February 2010) Virdi v The Law Society of England and Wales & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ… [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 2:34 pm
However, no one will come close to the image and notoriety that Evel Knievel created for himself jumping his V-Twin Harley Davidson, and breaking many bones. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 5:58 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Harley Marine Services, Inc., ARB Nos. 13-076, -077, ALJ No. 2012-SPA-2 (ARB July 31, 2015) Final Decision and Order PDF Chief, Div. of Enforcement, OLMS, USDOL v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 4:06 am
Tony Serra, et al v Harley Lappin, Director, Bureau of Prisons, et al, U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, April 09, 2010, No. 08-15969 The U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2008, 5:25 am
Accordingly, the court concluded that, by purchasing the paintball gun and then giving it to their son, the Gushees were negligent as a matter of law, and the only remaining question was whether that violation triggered Harley’s injuries.Since several questions remained unanswered, including whether the DiPilato’s actions as “an adult” absolved the Gushees from liability, the case against the Gushees was permitted to continue.Three… [read post]