Search for: "Harms v. Bennett"
Results 21 - 40
of 290
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
A draft statement by the data protection and privacy authorities of G7 countries has expressed concern over the “risks and potential harms to privacy, data protection, and other fundamental human rights” without the proper development and regulation of generative artificial intelligence. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 12:01 pm
Contact Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:21 am
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am
Internet and Social Media Former Facebook data scientist Francis Haugen’s new book argues that social media companies are still not being held accountable for the harms they cause users, especially young people. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am
” IPSO 022538-22 A woman v Mail Online, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02539-22 A woman v Daily Mail, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 10744-22 Gannon v Basildon Echo, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 09814-23 Leary v liverpoolecho.co.uk, 9 Reporting of a crime (2021), 4 Intrusion into grief or… [read post]
30 May 2023, 5:01 am
From Anonymous v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 8:00 am
Doe v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
On the same day, there were hearings on applications for injunctions in the cases of Payone v Logo and Searl v Dimova-Handley. [read post]
7 May 2023, 7:42 am
The sad reality is that harmful pseudo-science sells, but Amazon has the prerogative and perhaps moral obligation to decide that it won’t take that money. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 12:49 pm
From today's Ninth Circuit decision in Yim v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 1:41 am
As a result, it was wrong to find no serious harm to Mr Banks’ reputation. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm
The claimant successfully established that the harm suffered as a result of the defendant’s expression is sufficiently serious that the public interest in permitting this defamation proceeding to continue outweighs the public interest in protecting the defendant’s expression. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:36 am
On the same day, Chamberlain J heard an application in the case of VLM v LPB. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
Nebraska and Arizona v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:29 pm
See King v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:20 am
Providing inaccurate legal advice harms clients and places the lawyer at risk of liability for malpractice. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 4:05 pm
In nearly all defamation cases involving publications on social media, the parties disagree as to the actual extent of publication, which is relevant principally to the issues of serious harm and damages. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am
The LSE Media Blog has an article explaining the implications of the lack of friction in how harmful content spreads through Instagram Stories, one of the platform’s core features. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
Kresge Co. v. [read post]
