Search for: "Harrell v. Harrell"
Results 21 - 40
of 193
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2015, 2:46 pm
CASE: McCree v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 1:45 pm
CASE: Smiley v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:41 pm
Rogers Harrell. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 9:16 am
Harrell, Jr.This case considers whether a member of a corporation's board of directors breached his fiduciary duty owed to the corporation when he, removed as an employee of the corporation, filed suit against the corporation in order to enforce severance pay provisions of his employment agreement, pursued summary judgment b y default after the corporation failed to file a timely answer, and sought to enforce his money judgment, over the corporation's opposition, by attaching the… [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 10:58 am
Filed March 20, 2007--Opinion by Judge Clayton Greene (JJ Raker and Harrell dissenting).The Lobachs purchased a vehicle from Koons Ford and, after discovering defects in the vehicle, filed a complaint against Koons alleging, inter alia, that Koons violated the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act ("MMWA"), the Maryland Consumer Protection Act ("MCPA"), breach of contract, violation of the Maryland Commercial Law Code, fraud, and a derivative action against Suntrust Bank for all of… [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 2:41 pm
Dep't of Taxation v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:19 am
Here's the exchange:From: Harrell, Michael P. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 4:25 am
In Harrell v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:57 pm
Harrell, Jr.Held: Pursuant to Maryland Code (1997, 2006 Repl. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 7:41 am
In James Harrell v. [read post]
4 May 2007, 7:51 am
Harrell, Jr..From the official headnote:REAL PROPERTY - RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS - THE STANDARD FOR DETERMINING IF A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT REMAINS VALID IS WHETHER, AFTER THE PASSAGE OF A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF TIME, A CHANGE IN CIRCUMSTANCES HAS OCCURRED, SINCE THE COVENANTS’ EXECUTION, RENDERING THE PURPOSE OF THE COVENANT OBSOLETE.REAL PROPERTY - RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS - WAIVER - THE ASSERTING PARTY BEARS THE BURDEN OF PROVING WAIVER BY ACQUIESCENCE DEFENSE.ZONING - A MUNICIPALITY WITHOUT… [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 12:55 pm
This seems about right. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 11:27 am
" The Court cited the pivotal Delaware case Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 3:28 am
Harrell, Jr.The issue facing the Court of Appeals was whether specially assigned retired judges could properly sit with the Court of Special Appeals ("CSA") during the hearing and decision of an appeal in banc. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 1:50 am
Harrell, Jr.The question on appeal was whether a term in a deed of trust generically alluding to HUD regulations limiting the circumstances in which a mortgagee may accelerate and foreclose on an FHA-insured mortgage may be invoked by the mortgagor to enjoin foreclosure.The Court held that because foreclosure is an equitable remedy, a mortgagee seeking foreclosure is subject to being enjoined from foreclosing by a mortgagor alleging violations of the HUD regulations governing foreclosure. [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 11:36 am
Harrell, Jr.Held: Contract clauses allowing one party to terminate for "convenience" may be enforceable, subject to the implied obligation that the terminating party exercise its discretion in accordance with the implied obligations of good faith and fair dealing.Facts: A contractor took bids from three subcontractors to install carpet in an apartment complex and entered into a contract with one of them. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 11:24 am
In the Louisiana case of Harrell v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 11:00 pm
In Harrell v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 10:29 am
You can find the opinion in Coleman v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 10:16 am
Harrell, Jr. as to the immunity issue only. [read post]
