Search for: "Harrington v. CIR"
Results 21 - 40
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2016, 12:37 pm
See Harrington v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 11:46 am
Fischer, 687 F.3d 514 (2d Cir. 2012), nearly 20 years after Rivas’s conviction, ,the Second Circuit re-instated the habeas petition. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 1:53 pm
The court applied the AEDPA limitation on relief as described in Harrington v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
I went back 99 years to Haas v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 1:02 pm
Judge Kozinski disagreed with this reading of the PCR order, and argued that under Harrington v. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 7:25 am
In addition, the appeals panel cited Harrington v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 4:18 am
Mandell, Stephen Shea, Adam Harrington, a/k/a "Adam Rukdeschel," Arn Wilson, Robert Grabowski, and Michael Passaro were charged in two-counts with conspiracy to commit securities, wire and mail fraud; and with securities fraud. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 4:16 pm
In Newman v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
Harrington, 726 F.3d 921, 932 (7th Cir. 2013) (because "the state court’s decision denying post-conviction relief violated § 2254(d)[]," it was appropriate to consider de novo "the evidence presented at the federal evidentiary hearing"); Stitts v. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 1:31 pm
I admit that I too would be a bit flummoxed if a witness said "No" to the standard question (at the outset of his testimony) as to whether he swore to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 6:07 am
In Acosta v Acosta--- F.3d ----, 2013 WL 3970239 (C.A.8 (Minn.)) [read post]
30 May 2013, 9:05 pm
” Slip p. 4-5, Quoting Harrington v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
In order to be non-essential, it must be found not to be essential under both questions.[354] This interpretation is consistent with the approach taken by the Federal Court of Appeal in Halford v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 1:18 pm
Ct. 1388 (2011), and Harrington v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 8:11 pm
JamesDocket: 12-11Issue(s): Whether the Ninth Circuit’s panel opinion conflicts with the Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) and this Court's decisions in Harrington v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:35 am
Mont. 1993) (color green used on graphite fishing rods found to be functional); Russell Harrington Cutlery Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:21 pm
In Acosta v Acosta, 2012 WL 2178982 (D.Minn.) [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:27 pm
” McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 7:25 am
As I discussed in this post, in its decision last year in Harrington v. [read post]
