Search for: "Harris v. Green et al" Results 21 - 40 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(GRAY on Claims) District Court E D Texas finds Applied Medical Resources liable for infringement of Covidien’s surgical device patent (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas limits number of patent claims and prior art references asserted in case: SynQor, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Non-practising entity entitled to permanent injunction where infringed patent was the subject of prior exclusive license:… [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:06 am by Don Cruse
Opinion (Lehrmann): PDF Reddy Partnership/5900 North Freeway LP and Reddy Partnership, et al. v. [read post]
Oct. 23, 2009)(per curiam) (opinion on denial of motion for rehearing) (limited discovery prior to arbitration sometimes permissible) IN RE HOUSTON PIPE LINE COMPANY, L.P., ET AL.; from Victoria County;13th district (13-07-00299-CV & 13-07-00362-CV, 269SW3d 90, 08-26-08). [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“In this legal malpractice action, plaintiff, defendants’ former client, contends that “but for” defendants’ negligence he would have obtained a favorable jury verdict in his underlying personal injury action against the owner and driver of a truck (Caso v Santos, et al. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 10:53 am
Paul Guardian Insurance, et al , a 12-page opinion, Judge Kirsch writes:Dreaded, Inc. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
HOLLAND, Appellee On Appeal from the 11th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2012-41959 Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Massengale and Brown. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Micheal Sanchez
Al. v. 1717 Bissonnet, L.L.C., Cause No. 2013-26155, 157th Judicial District, Harris County, Texas. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm by Martin George
One current example is the ongoing discussion about the Heidelberg Report2 which proposes to replace the so-called arbitration exception of Article 1 (2)(d) of the Brussels I Regulation (JR) by two new articles which shall address positively the interfaces between arbitration and the Regulation and strengthen arbitration within the European Judicial Area.3 The following article first delineates the background of the present discussion (II), than it briefly presents the proposals of the Heidelberg… [read post]