Search for: "Hart v. Woods" Results 21 - 40 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Sep 2010, 3:38 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
HART, CPA; and MOORE & HART, CPA, 6:09-CV-920;UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK; 2010 U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
  We had a post by Lorna Woods The ICO issued a statement about the decision, as did EDPS, EDPB and CNIL. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 7:17 am by Melina Padron
Wood, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Education [2011] EWHC 3256 (Admin) (09 December 2011)December 9, 2011 Administrative Court dismisses judicial review of decision to bar former-teacher from working with children. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am by INFORRM
We highlight the following points: (i)   If the information that an applicant for an interim injunction wishes to prevent publication of is private to the applicant and its publication is liable to be intrusive in some serious was (In relation to ‘seriousness’, see Wood v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2009] EWCA Civ 414 [22] ) such that his Article 8 rights are engaged, why should it matter—for the purpose of stage 1 of the Re S analysis at… [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:56 am by INFORRM
Neil Turner v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 12/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Ms Carina Trimingham v Metro, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Bath & North East Somerset Council v The Times, Clause 5, 11/04/2013; Warren Hamilton Daily Mai, Clause 1, 11/04/2013; Catherine Whiteside The Scottish Sun, Clauses 1, 5, 11/04/2013; Ms Lynne Hales v Daily Mail, Clause 6, 11/04/2013; Emilie Sandy v The Citizen (Gloucester) v… [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I offer a couple of examples, written by Chief Justice Hughes (who was no slouch as a lawyer), out of many that could be deployed.[12]  Wood v. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  The work has been comprehensively updated to take in the latest case including Lachaux, Stocker, Serafin, Lloyd v Google, Economou, Wright v Ver, Wright v Granath, Corbyn v Millett, Duchess of Sussex v Associated, and Soriano v Forensic News. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm by Geoffrey Rapp
Palanzo, Comment, Safety squeeze: banning non-wood bats is not the answer to amateur baseball’s bat problem, 51 JURIMETRICS JOURNAL 319 (2011)R. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 4:56 am by Rob Robinson
http://tinyurl.com/3z9svqa (Philip Gordon) No Duty to Disclose That Office Equipment Retained Data — Putnam Bank v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 3:41 pm
Nor had the Supreme Court yet ruled in United State v. [read post]