Search for: "Hartford" Results 21 - 40 of 5,165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2024, 10:12 am
Hartford(Negligence; motion for summary judgment; governmental immunity; claim that trial court 2 improperly denied plaintiff's requests to amend her complaint; whether trial court erred in addressing sua sponte whether proposed new claims were barred by applicable statutes of limitations (§§ 52-577 and 52-584); claim that trial court erred in concluding that plaintiff's complaint failed to set forth claim of public nuisance). [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:42 pm by Tim Zinnecker
Candidates should expect to work at the Law School located in Hartford, Connecticut. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:54 am by The White Law Group
(CRD#:5685), PARAMUS, NJ,B, 12/09/2010 – 12/22/2011, HARTFORD EQUITY SALES COMPANY INC. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:56 am by Anna Armstrong
Inevitably, when you approach long-term disability insurance carriers like Unum, Cigna, New York Life, Hartford, or Principal for a buyout of your claim, it’s actually considered an official red flag and something that they have to report. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:14 am by Tim Zinnecker
Candidates should expect to work at the Law School located in Hartford, Connecticut. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:00 am by Ortiz Law Firm
Major insurance companies like Hartford and Unum have sometimes been known to act as third-party administrators. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 12:07 pm by tvasil
Join Locke Lord, InsurTechNY and InsurTech Hartford for their next InsurTech Legal Academy webinar series on legal and regulatory issues ‎impacting the InsurTech industry. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 1:00 am
A few weeks ago, my aunt Theresa spearheaded the 70th birthday party for my mother, Joanne Kotulski. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:06 pm by Jon L. Gelman
”The trial judge found that “Hartford’s exclusion provision was unambiguous, stating “this insurance does not cover any and all intentional wrongs within the exception allowed by N.J.S.A. 34:15-8” (emphasis omitted) (citation omitted); thus, Hartford’s policy excluded coverage…” The appellate court agreed and distinguished the contractual language from that raised in the NJ Mfrs. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 9:20 am
Hartford (Employment discrimination; summary judgment; provision (§ 46a-60) of Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act (§ 46a-51 et seq.); claim that trial court improperly determined that no genuine issue of material fact existed that plaintiff failed to establish prima facie case of disability discrimination or retaliation resulting from city's decision not to rehire him as police officer; claim that city's reason for not rehiring pl [read post]