Search for: "Haug v. Haug"
Results 21 - 40
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that contrary to the Employee's contention, the record before the hearing officer contained substantial evidence to sustain the findings of misconduct and, citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d at 1046, and, contrary to the Employee's assertion, noted that "hearsay statements ... were admissible" in a Civil Service Law §75 administrative disciplinary action. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division explained that "[T]he substantial evidence standard is a minimal standard" that is "less than a preponderance of the evidence, and demands only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that contrary to the Employee's contention, the record before the hearing officer contained substantial evidence to sustain the findings of misconduct and, citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d at 1046, and, contrary to the Employee's assertion, noted that "hearsay statements ... were admissible" in a Civil Service Law §75 administrative disciplinary action. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 5:05 am
" Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division explained that "[T]he substantial evidence standard is a minimal standard" that is "less than a preponderance of the evidence, and demands only that a given inference is reasonable and plausible, not necessarily the most probable. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 5:57 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:17 am
Steel Corp. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 9:21 am
Haug, 424 Pa. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 8:20 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
As a question of substantial evidence was raised by Petitioner, the proceeding was transferred to the Appellate Division.Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division noted that the Court of Appeals had recently reviewed the principles governing judicial review of administrative determinations under the substantial evidence standard and noted that, as relevant in this action, the high court had emphasized that "the… [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 4:00 am
As a question of substantial evidence was raised by Petitioner, the proceeding was transferred to the Appellate Division.Citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d 1044, the Appellate Division noted that the Court of Appeals had recently reviewed the principles governing judicial review of administrative determinations under the substantial evidence standard and noted that, as relevant in this action, the high court had emphasized that "the… [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:30 pm
Hyatt, Supreme Court Denies Certiorari in Streck v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 8:03 am
Haug of Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP argued for losing party AlphaPharm, and William A. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:18 am
By Dennis Crouch Bowman v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 2:18 am
There are a host of issues in DSG Evergreen v Town of Perry, No. 2009AP727 (Wis. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 11:30 pm
Haug's advice. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 6:04 am
The New York Court of Appeals holds that hearsay evidence was enough to support an adverse finding against the male student.The case is In the Matter of Haug v. [read post]
9 Nov 2019, 11:09 am
Teller v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
Abdel Wahab eds., The Hauge: Eleven International, 2012) [read post]
25 Oct 2012, 7:11 am
Cases like Pheasant Bridge Corporation v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 1:39 pm
Hauge is an Associate in the Gibbons Real Property & Environmental Department. [read post]
