Search for: "Hawkins v. State Bar" Results 21 - 40 of 107
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2008, 11:19 am
The 9th (Hall joined by Pregerson and Hawkins) affirm. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
" "A Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend a judgment `serve[s] the narrow purpose of allowing a party to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence.'" Merritt Hawkins & Assocs. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm by Wolfgang Demino
" "A Rule 59(e) motion to alter or amend a judgment `serve[s] the narrow purpose of allowing a party to correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence.'" Merritt Hawkins & Assocs. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 7:12 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Today the Supreme Court hears oral argument in California v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 2:32 am
The court also rejected the government's request to dismiss the case as barred by the "state secrets privilege. [read post]