Search for: "Haynes v. Mark" Results 21 - 40 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2010, 11:36 am by Steve Hall
"Hayes has shown that the state's reasons for striking ... were implausible or invalid, and therefore were pretexts for discrimination," stated the decision written by Judge Catharina Haynes, a former civil court judge in Dallas.And:The decision marked the second time in 13 months that the appeals court has overturned a case from Dallas County because of jury discrimination. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
Challenge to Will based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence rejectedIN RE ESTATE OF TORNABENDOCKET NO. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 9:37 am by Ken
Today, as CNN reported, the United States Supreme Court rejected cert in the case Bogani Charles Calhoun v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 11:23 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
           One of the major cases dealing with undue influence was Haynes v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:50 am by Emma Durand-Wood
Rhode Island elder attorney Mark Heffner was interviewed by the Providence Journal on changes to the legal profession. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
Four Paul Hastings Partners Join Haynes and Boone New York Law Journal Four real estate partners are leaving Paul Hastings to join the New York office of Haynes and Boone. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
          One of the major cases dealing with undue influence was Haynes v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 2:11 pm by Mark Bennett
Haynes thinks, and Judge Johnson agrees (at least until she reads U.S. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Owen, Jennifer Walker Elrod, and Catharina Haynes, and now joined by recent Trump appointees Don R. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 7:40 pm by cdw
” [via Lexisone] Mark Allen Geralds v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am by INFORRM
(No 32072/2022) in the Rome Court of First Instance, which was asked whether the unauthorized production (minting), advertising, and offer for sale of a non-fungible token (NFT) infringe one’s own trade mark rights. [read post]