Search for: "He, et al v. Holder" Results 21 - 40 of 412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2013, 11:42 am by Docket Navigator
Advanced Image Direct LLC, et. al., 8-12-cv-01090 (CACD January 30, 2013, Order) (Carter, J.). [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 7:08 pm
Apparently, however, this was not a use that would fall under any fair use analysis, according to the RIAA, et al, but simply a license they were granting to do so. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Citing Monsanto Co. v Scruggs et Al., the court held that the purchaser of a patented technologies which can replicate itself is not authorised to use replicated copies of it, as this practice 'would eviscerate the rights of the patent holder'. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 12:05 pm by Dennis Crouch
Validity – Obviousness: Nichia Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 11:16 pm by Florian Mueller
Let's assume for the sake of the argument that Judge Brinkman was right that "there is no simple alternative solution available to Apple et al. to circumvent EP 131's patented technology in [its] consumer products" because it's a circuitry patent, so you can't just do a quick software update. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:01 pm by sgottlieb
S. ___ (2013). [2] See Brief Of Amici Curiae Professors Gary King, et al, 2006 U.S. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 8:35 am by Dennis Crouch
Mark Lemley filed a brief on behalf of Powell Books, et al. that runs in parallel with a brief filed by a group of art museums. [read post]