Search for: "Head v. Merit Systems Protection Board"
Results 21 - 40
of 177
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm
Judge Terry Doughty’s opinion: “Various emails show Plaintiffs are likely to succeed on the merits through evidence that the motivation of the NIAID Defendants was a ‘take down’ of protected free speech. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 12:35 pm
Arthur served during the 1883 enactment of the Pendleton Act, the first statute to establish a comprehensive merit-based civil service selection system. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:25 pm
Along the way, it relies heavily on two of the court’s precedents: the 1946 decision in Social Security Board v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 4:01 am
Monroe County Board of Education. [read post]
7 May 2024, 8:47 am
Lion Elastomers (Protected Activity): Oral argument was held on Monday, April 29 in Lion Elastomers, LLC v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
In a series of recent posts (most recent here), I’ve been sharply critical of filings by the Solicitor General in the Hargan v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:12 am
In a series of recent posts (most recent here), I’ve been sharply critical of filings by the Solicitor General in the Hargan v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
The DPC can offer its decision after the European Data Protection Board announced the finalisation of its binding Article 65 decision on the matter. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 12:42 pm
As Breyer points out, the SEC’s ALJs enjoy a similar multi-level, for-cause protection: An ALJ can be removed only for cause by the Merit Systems Protection Board, whose members in turn can be removed by the president only for cause. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 1:10 pm
Setting aside the reality that Egan posed the rather narrow question whether a naval employee denied a security clearance had a statutory right to review of the decision by the Merit Systems Protection Board, the Court’s central rationale for ruling against a right of review was the importance in the security context of respecting expert agency discretion. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 1:10 pm
Setting aside the reality that Egan posed the rather narrow question whether a naval employee denied a security clearance had a statutory right to review of the decision by the Merit Systems Protection Board, the Court’s central rationale for ruling against a right of review was the importance in the security context of respecting expert agency discretion. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am
My DOJ friend shook his head at this advice, remarking that I probably needed my own attorney. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:51 am
You surely recall the Hassell v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 12:55 pm
In the long run, however, a legal system that regularly exculpates the type of reckless conduct alleged in McPadden and does so at the pleadings stage risks having investors turn elsewhere for protection. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:48 pm
It does so by establishing a limited system for case-by-case oversight in which judicial review of the substantive merits of those decisions is avoided. [read post]
29 Nov 2015, 9:34 pm
While a number of states supporting the tax board in that appeal asked the Court to overrule Nevada v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 10:28 pm
But off the top of my head, I don't know what those records would be. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 11:12 am
., v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 5:00 am
Herrick v. [read post]
