Search for: "Henkell v. Henkell"
Results 21 - 40
of 99
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
Henkel AG, […] [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 5:43 pm
§ 1117(a); Burger King v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 11:46 am
Henkel, 216 U.S. 462, 479-480 (1910). [3] Bell Atl. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:29 pm
Henkel, 201 U. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 11:12 am
Henkel, 201 U.S. 43, 76 (1906). [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 12:21 am
Yesterday, the ECJ has rendered its decision in Case C-498/16 Maximilian Schrems v Facebook Ireland Limited. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
See Henkel v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 3:00 am
Cripe, et al. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 12:30 pm
Henkel, cited above). [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:56 am
The case is NuScience Corp. v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 11:56 am
The case is NuScience Corp. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 5:32 am
The case is NuScience Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 5:30 am
In The Carlson Group, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
Henkel, supra. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 1:12 pm
Henkel v. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
In Bongrain SA’s Trade Mark Application [2004] EWCA Civ 1690 at [26]-[28], Jacobs LJ had, interpreting various European case law including Joined Cases C-456/01P and C-457/01 P Henkel v OHIM EU:C:2004:258, rejected the idea that a “fancy” or unusual shape of goods would automatically be taken by the public as a trade mark denoting trade origin. [read post]
15 Oct 2015, 11:15 am
The opinion overruled the California Supreme Court’s prior decision in Henkel Corp. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 10:42 am
(Henkel Corp. v. [read post]
