Search for: "Henning, Appeal of" Results 21 - 40 of 1,267
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2024, 2:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“[W]hen a frustrated litigant complained of counsel’s omissions,’[p]laintiff’s remedy relies on prima facie proof that she would have succeeded’[.] [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:20 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
State Farm The Maryland Court of Appeals answered this question incorrectly in Stickley v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 6:31 am
  He cited activities such as: renting part of the property for horse grazing and boarding; gathering and processing maple sap from trees on the property; keeping laying hens and selling their eggs for cash; raising and harvesting goats; raising and harvesting cattle; clearing pasture land; adding new fences and gates; etc. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
Supreme Court were to settle upon and announce a definition in this case—particularly one as broad and open-ended as that in Noah Webster’s 1857 American Dictionary of the English Language (which included “the open and active opposition of a number of persons to the execution of law”)—such a ruling could have unanticipated downstream ramifications for other cases that are materially different from this one, and implications for statutes that use the… [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
 Pix credit hereCates 1980 has distributed its February 2024 Report. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 1:30 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Cruz, 761 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal explained that “[w]hen trade secret privilege is asserted as the basis for resisting production, the trial court must determine whether the requested production constitutes a trade secret; if so, the court must require the party seeking production to show reasonable necessity for the requested materials. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:28 am by DONALD SCARINCI
” In light of Bruen, the appeals court reversed course and issued a new opinion. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 4:53 pm by Jocelyn Bosse
 CopyrightKatfriend Henning Hartwig (Bardehle Pagenberg) outlined the questions referred to the CJEU by the Swedish Patent and Market Court of Appeal, which seeks to clarify the significance of the degree of originality of the work for the scope of protection of the work. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm by Amy Howe
” Karlan agreed, telling Kagan that “[w]hen you’re doing your job, you’re doing the function of being a Trustee of the Poway School District. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 1:12 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Here’s what Henning writes: Reciprocity in copyright lawby Henning HartwigOn 21 September 2023, the Swedish Patent and Market Court of Appeal issued a court order (Mio and Others v Galleri Mikael & Thomas Asplund Aktiebolag, Swedish Patent and Market Court of Appeal, 21 September 2023, PMT 13496-22 (the matter is now pending before the CJEU; C-580/23), referring questions to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling pursuant to Article 267 TFEU concerning the… [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
The Supreme Court is to decide whether the Court of Appeal was correct to strike out the claim as an abuse of process. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:31 am by Russell Knight
Void Judgments In An Illinois Divorce “[W]hen a section 2–1401 petitioner alleges that the challenged judgment is void, the allegation substitutes for and negates the need to allege a meritorious defense and due diligence. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 9:25 am by Keith Szeliga and Daniel Alvarado
The Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals has explained the relationship between the two subsections as follows: The more that a claimed cost satisfies the business necessity requirement in subsection (c), the more the contractor’s burden to satisfy the benefit requirement in subsection (b) is reduced. [read post]