Search for: "Henry v Simon" Results 21 - 40 of 98
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2011, 3:40 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
As plaintiff seeks to recover a refund of an alleged overpayment of fees paid to the decedent, affording the complaint a liberal construction, and according its factual allegations every possible favorable inference (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]; Minsky v Haber, 74 AD3d 763, 764 [2010]), we find that plaintiff has asserted a breach of contract claim (see Reidy v Martin, 77 AD3d 903 [2010]; Henry v Brenner, 271 AD2d 647, 648 [2000]). [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 29 January 2018, the death was announced of retired Lord Justice, human rights campaigner, blogger and IT champion, Sir Henry Brooke. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 12:35 am
Simon NEW YORK COUNTYLandlord/Tenant LawHearing Is Necessary to See if Stipulation Signed By Unrepresented Tenant Should Be Modified 1775 Housing Associates LP v. [read post]
3 Sep 2007, 1:14 pm
The best argument for this view would rely on the Supreme Court's 1991 decision in Simon & Schuster v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
He remained close to the other Harlans, one of whom was Justice John Marshall Harlan — the “great dissenter” of the Supreme Court — who argued on behalf of equal rights under the law in Plessy v. [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
The first book is a dissection of the Trayvon Martin case with a highly critical analysis of the prosecution’s presentation in People v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:47 am by Sean Patrick Donlan
  ChairDr Ruth Fletcher, Queen Mary University of LondonProgramme3-4pm: Making Land Liquid: Race, Time and Title RegistrationAuthor: Sarah Keenan, Birkbeck University of LondonCommentator: Simon Reid-Henry, Queen Mary University of LondonDiscussion4-5pm: How does law make place? [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:30 am by Kiran Bhat
Yesterday the Court heard arguments in Armour v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:11 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Jurisdictional Boundaries of Prior Use within Britain: An analysis of the House of Lords’ judgments in Roebuck v Stirling (1774) and Brown v Annandale (1842)Barbara Henry (University of Hertfordshire)Commentator | Eva Hemmungs Wirtén (Linköping University, Sweden) Two cases, 60 years apart. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 1:51 am by Graeme Hall
Writing in the Strasbourg Observers blog, Stijn Smet assesses the European Court of Human Rights’ decision in Lautsi v. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
Simon LazarusNo less than the Trump administration, Supreme Court pundits felt blind-sided by Chief Justice John Roberts’ rejection, in Department of Commerce v. [read post]