Search for: "Herring v. Reed"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,092
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2024, 12:20 am
But what is of relevance is the reliance that the Deputy Chancellor placed (at paragraph 9) upon observations from the judgment of Lord Reed, in the Supreme Court, in Walton v The Scottish Ministers [2012] UKSC 44, [2013] PTSR 51 (at paragraph 92) drawing a distinction between ‘the mere busybody and the person affected by or having a reasonable concern in the matter to which the application relates’. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm
—— Fy, what an indirect and peevish course Is this of hers? [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
The items included: replacement of the pews with chairs; replacement of the stone font with a moveable wooden font; removal of the main reed organ [an early 20th century harmonium]; creation of a lobby at the west end of the church, and kitchen, toilet and storage facilities; electrical wiring and light fittings; and water and space heating [3, 4]. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Reed, 257 N.C. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
The claimant was a therapist who sued her former colleague for passing off the claimant’s business as her own. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
United States Patrick Reed’s $750m (£618m) defamation lawsuits against golf reporters and media outlets has been dismissed by a federal judge in Florida. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 10:58 am
Reed v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 3:30 pm
Nguyen v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 5:25 pm
For more on double jeopardy, read: Amar, Akhil Reed. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am
My co-panelist Clare Morell of the Ethics and Public Policy Center put together an excellent tweet thread summarizing some of her thoughts, including on the anonymous-speech angle. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 11:00 am
On August 18, 2023, the Fifth Circuit sitting en banc in Hamilton v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:51 pm
Louis and Davis v. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
The Tenth Circuit held that, whether viewed as compelled speech or as a content-based restriction, the restriction had to – and did – satisfy strict scrutiny: Colorado could show that it has a compelling interest, and that the restriction is narrowly tailored to satisfy that interest (Reed v Town of Gilbert 576 US 155, 164 (2015)). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:51 am
In Chewy v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 5:34 am
Real Estate and conflicts of interest are transactional situations rife with claims of legal malpractice, and Fields v Baker & Hostetler LLP 2023 NY Slip Op 50610(U) Decided on June 23, 2023 Supreme Court, New York County Reed, J. is no exception. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:58 am
Although the Supreme Court in Reed v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:41 am
Reed, a fine launchpad to consider the law of restrictive covenants in New York business divorce cases. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
Tam and Iancu v. [read post]
10 Jun 2023, 2:40 pm
From Donald Trump v. [read post]
