Search for: "Hickey v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 91
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2008, 5:39 pm
Hickey says he believes South Dakota has been chosen by God to challenge Roe v. [read post]
3 Oct 2007, 5:47 am
The State places the greatest weight for justification of the frisk on Officer Hickey's testimony that she felt in fear for her safety. [read post]
25 May 2018, 10:26 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Strange as a defendant, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.Plaintiffs were not required to submit an affidavit of merit or make any other evidentiary showing in support of their motion (see Berkeley Research Group, LLC v FTI Consulting, Inc., 157 AD3d 486, 490, 69 N.Y.S.3d 26 [1st Dept 2018]; Hickey v Steven E. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 11:29 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Attorney General United States, No. 19-1404 (3d Cir. 2020) Related posts: Fourth Circuit Rejects Anti-Spam Lawsuit–Omega World Travel v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 3:19 pm by Josh Blackman
Griswold (183-186) Altering the size of the Supreme Court (187-188) The Progressive Era United States v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Further, the Association argued that it "owned the right to go to arbitration" which is the traditional view in such situations.In Hickey v Hempstead Union Free School District, 36 A.D.3d 760, the Appellate Division said that a union member generally has no individual rights under a collective bargaining agreement that he or she can enforce against an employer. [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 9:35 am by Carter Wood
(Jack) Hickey, FL Plastic Surgery Malpractice -- Spencer M. [read post]
22 May 2011, 9:29 am by Jim Walker
The passenger was represented by Jack Hickey and David Appleby of the Hickey Law Firm. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 6:32 pm
Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1 (1890), that the Eleventh Amendment prohibition of suits "against one of the United States by Citizens of another State" applies to suits brought against a state by a citizen of the same state).3  See United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
R v Hickey is the most recent case to consider the legality of an apprehension pursuant to s. 28(1) of the MHA. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 12:37 pm by Danny Jacobs
The short also alludes to other, famous artistic legal battles, including the fair use case of Rogers v. [read post]