Search for: "Hill v. State Employees Retirement Commission"
Results 21 - 40
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Military Departments on the state of the services. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
“Head-of-state-owned enterprise” immunity. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:26 pm
Ability to cultivate and maintain relationships with advocacy partners such as senior-level former government officials, retired military leaders, diplomats, or intelligence officials. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 1:36 pm
Ability to cultivate and maintain relationships with advocacy partners such as senior-level former government officials, retired military leaders, diplomats, or intelligence officials. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:16 am
Steager, which asks whether federal law or the doctrine of intergovernmental tax immunity prevents West Virginia from differential taxation of retirement benefits of certain former state and federal employees; Zelinsky predicts the court will hold “that any income tax exemption a state extends to any of its former employees must also be given to all federal retirees living in the state. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the federal regulator tasked with policing the disclosures to shareholders by public companies like Google. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:15 am
” At Medium, Nick Lum points out that the South Dakota attorney general, who represented the state in South Dakota v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am
At The Hill, Brett Samuels reports that an “adviser to President Trump on judicial issues said Sunday that the choice to replace retiring Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy is not about whether the pick will overturn Roe v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, in which the court held that an Illinois law allowing public-sector unions to charge nonmembers for collective-bargaining activities violates the First Amendment, doesn’t have to “’cripple’” certain unions across the country. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 4:07 am
United States and Collins v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, which asks whether SEC administrative law judges are “officers of the United States” within the meaning of the appointments clause. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am
Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued further interpretive guidance to assist public companies in preparing disclosures about cybersecurity risks and incidents (the “2018 SEC Guidance”). [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:57 am
In North Carolina v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am
” At Reuters, Alison Frankel weighs in on Monday’s argument in California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:38 am
Another Monday argument was in California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 4:19 pm
Ardia, University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill – School of Law. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:47 am
Love v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 4:14 am
As discussed here, in Public Employees’ Retirement System of Mississippi, v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 2:10 pm
This law would have amended ERISA (the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, which regulates employee benefits plans) to require that most health insurance plans cover prescription contraceptives on the same terms as other prescription drugs. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am
Also, Barclays and UBS have reportedly hired criminal defense lawyers to represent employees with regard to the investigations.[15] For the most part, the regulators that have made public statements about the investigations have only stated that the investigations remain in the early stages. [read post]
