Search for: "Hill v. State of Tenn." Results 21 - 40 of 101
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2018, 3:20 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Plaintiff then filed a second amended complaint, naming both the Publix and Hill defendants, and specifically stating that she was adding the Hill defendants pursuant to Tenn. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 11:32 am by Molly E. Reynolds
The bill’s inclusion in the omnibus is particularly notable because lawmakers were facing a ticking clock: The CLOUD Act, if passed, would moot the upcoming Supreme Court decision on cross-border data access in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 2:00 pm by John Buhl
Supreme Court Is Likely to Uphold State Powers in Some Way The pending South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 10:16 am by Staley Smith
Writing for the majority in Maslenjak v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:03 pm by J. Ross Pepper
Cities Service Co., 578 S.W.2d 621 (Tenn. 1979): A writing which described the property as “lots 99 and 100 in Cherokee Hills” was insufficient. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 1:03 pm by J. Ross Pepper
Cities Service Co., 578 S.W.2d 621 (Tenn. 1979): A writing which described the property as “lots 99 and 100 in Cherokee Hills” was insufficient. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
  For other Texas (and other states’) cases applying the learned intermediary rule to prescription medical devices, see our post here.Collectively, strike one.Second, Texas’ rejection of design defect claims involving prescription medical products is also reflected in that state’s product liability statute. [read post]