Search for: "Hill v. Stephens"
Results 21 - 40
of 424
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 am
Mark Hill KC Professor Hill is Global Visiting Professor and Distinguished Fellow at the University of Notre Dame London Law Program and an Extraordinary Professor at Pretoria University, South Africa. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 12:07 pm
Kinnaird asserted that (1) Strickland does not apply solely to trial consequences, as indicated in Hill's application of the case to parole eligibility; (2) Brady v. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 9:57 am
Supreme Court in Lamps Plus, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 9:30 pm
McMahonDale Carpenter, FLAGRANT CONDUCT: THE STORY OF LAWRENCE V. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:33 am
By Stephen P. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:01 am
Justice Stephen J. [read post]
1 May 2017, 4:10 am
Last week, the court heard oral argument in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2023, 3:00 am
His public comment to The History of Public Adjusting—Samuel Milch v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 3:23 pm
From Marcus v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 8:13 am
Hill, and Walter A. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Michael Burke, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 3:54 pm
On the denial of the regular petition, Justices Stephen G. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:41 pm
(Eugene Volokh) From Hoye v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:56 am
Young Jr. and Justice Stephen J. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 11:58 am
Scientific-Atlanta (earlier: Jul. 31, etc.), including former SEC chairs Roderick Hills, Harvey Pitt and Harold Williams; and law professors Richard Epstein, Joseph Grundfest, Stephen Bainbridge, and Larry Ribstein. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 5:02 am
Henry, Stephen E. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:56 am
Lydia Wheeler of The Hill reports on the looming end of the Term, suggesting that a “short-handed Supreme Court is limping to the finish line. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 3:48 am
In an op-ed for The Hill, Ethan Blevins urges the court to review Elster v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:05 pm
In United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 3:19 pm
March 11, 2003), citing Hill v. [read post]
