Search for: "Hiller v. Hiller" Results 21 - 40 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
Potential Changes to Fund of Funds Arrangements Posted by Thomas Hiller, Brian McCabe, and Edward Baer, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Friday, February 1, 2019 Tags: Exchange-traded funds, Investment advisers, Investment Advisers Act, Investor protection, Risk management, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Section 12(d), Securities regulation The Latest on Proxy Access Posted by Holly J. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Based on the defendants’ submissions, the parties’ attorney-client relationship did not end until at least June 8, 2001, when the Supreme Court granted that branch of the defendants’ motion which was to withdraw as counsel for the plaintiff in the divorce action (see Tulino v Hiller, P.C., 202 AD3d 1132, 1135; Garafalo v Mayoka, 151 AD3d 1018, 1019; Farage v Ehrenberg, 124 AD3d at 165). [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The statute of limitations for a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice is three years, which accrues at the time the malpractice is committed” (Tulino v Hiller, P.C., 202 AD3d 1132, 1135 [internal citations omitted]). [read post]
19 Jan 2018, 3:45 pm by Patricia Salkin
Charter Township of York v Hiller, 2018 WL 472187 (MI App. 1/18/2018) This post was authored by Matthew Loeser, Esq. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“On a motion to dismiss a cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) on the ground that it is barred by the statute of limitations, a defendant bears the initial burden of establishing, prima facie, that the time in which to sue has expired” (Tulino v Hiller, P.C., 202 AD3d 1132, 1134-1135). [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 3:15 am
*After the termination of his Section 207-a benefits was confirmed on appeal (Matter of Wiley v Hiller, 277 AD2d 1024 [2000], appeal dismissed 96 NY2d 852 [2001]), Wiley applied for Workers’ Compensation benefits for his 1981 injury.Watertown contested the payment of the claim on the grounds that, among other things, the City of Watertown had not extended workers’ compensation coverage to paid firefighters prior to Wiley’s injury and, in any event, his claim is… [read post]
3 Nov 2006, 8:22 am
Granville Visitation Rights of Grandparents, Utah In the Matter of Petition for Adoption of C.A., Colorado Supreme Court, June 26, 2006 Hiller v. [read post]
27 Dec 2010, 1:45 pm by Alfred Brophy
 One of them, for instance, is United States v. [read post]