Search for: "Hof v Hof" Results 21 - 40 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2014, 7:54 am by Karel Frielink
Voor het overige is het oordeel van het hof verweven met waarderingen van feitelijke aard en is het begrijpelijk en toereikend gemotiveerd. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 12:30 am by Giorgio Buono
C-133/08), was lodged on 29 July 2010 under C-384/10, Jan Voogsgeerd v Navimer SA. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 7:45 am
BEST then appealed to the Hof van Cassatie on a point of law. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:45 am by Jeremy
The hof van beroep te Brussel (Court of Appeal, Brussels), hearing the matter on appeal, requested the Court of Justice to clarify the conditions that a work must fulfil in order to be classifiable as parody. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 2:53 am by Jeremy
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) gave its ruling yesterday in Case C‑325/14, SBS Belgium NV v Belgische Vereniging van Auteurs, Componisten en Uitgevers (SABAM), on a reference for a preliminary ruling from the hof van beroep te Brussel (Brussels Court of Appeal, Belgium). [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:31 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Although an attorney representing the executor of an estate, generally, is not liable to the beneficiaries of the estate (see Kramer v Belfi, 106 AD2d 615, 616), as the attorney does not represent the estate itself (see Betz v Blatt, 116 AD3d at 816; Matter of Hof, 102 AD2d 591, 593), when fraud, collusion, malicious acts, or other special circumstances exist, an attorney may be liable to those third parties, even though not in privity with them, for harm caused by… [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
This is reference for a preliminary ruling from Hof van beroep te Brussel arising from an application to register 'The Kitchen Company' and looks like it's seeking clarification of the ECJ's earlier judgment in Koninklijke KPN Nederland (POSTKANTOOR). [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:51 pm
Also referred is Case C-140/10 Greenstar-Kanzi Europe NV v Jean Hustin and Jo Goossens, in which the Hof van Cassatie van België (Belgium) seeks a ruling on the questions: "1. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
& Hof S. van der (2018), Consent and Privacy. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Washington-Carty v Fisher, heard 14 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) David v Hosany,  heard 20, 21 and 24 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) Bukovsky v CPS, heard 5 October 2017 (Gross, Si [read post]
12 Nov 2016, 7:47 am by Karel Frielink
De Hoge Raad is het daarmee eens: Het oordeel van het hof strookt met de regel van art. 13 Fw dat handelingen van de curator die zijn verricht na vernietiging van het vonnis tot faillietverklaring, maar vóór of op de dag waarop aan het voorschrift tot aankondiging overeenkomstig art. 15 Fw is voldaan, voor de schuldenaar geldig en verbindend blijven (vgl. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:53 am
 It's Case C-657/11 Belgian Electronic Sorting Technology (BEST) v Bert Peelaers and Visys NV. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 12:00 pm by Ritika Singh
The NRA has filed this amicus brief in ACLU v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 1:00 am
It appears that none of the allegedly copied authors has so far filed an official complaint with the prosecution authorities and it is now up to the prosecution authorities in Hof, Bavaria to investigate further after zu Guttenberg resigned from all his official posts and as such is no longer covered by the immunity laws. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:33 pm
The State Prosecution in Hof, Bavaria has the ungrateful task of investigating zu Guttenberg's criminal law liability. [read post]
9 May 2014, 9:00 pm by Karel Frielink
” Het Hof heeft zich terecht de vraag gesteld wat het destijds (in 1998) geldende recht meebracht. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Following Recent Cases in Media Law at the European Court of Human Rights, van der Hof et al. [read post]