Search for: "Holder v. Smith"
Results 21 - 40
of 576
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2023, 4:22 am
German national courts would presumably apply the Sisvel v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 5:44 am
Every year after Labor Day, I take a step back to survey the most important current trends and developments in the world of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and insurance. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 1:32 am
If they proposed some Huawei v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 2:34 pm
Tendering of a cheque can amount to (conditional) payment, if the cheque is honoured (Felix Hadley & Co v Hadley (1898) 2 Ch 681 ), and if so, counts as payment at the date the cheque is tendered (Homes v Smith (2000) Lloyds LR 139 ). [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts 1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
“ Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts 1) Good for the Goose: Own goal for Lidl in future lookalike cases by Julius Stobbs, Amelia Sainsbury and Nirmal Trivedy “This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 7:29 am
This post is the second of four, considering the decision of Smith J in Lidl v Tesco [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch), focusing on the passing off element of the judgment. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 6:15 am
Of course, such decisions can and this one is indeed going to be appealed--which is also a safe assumption with respect to an even higher-profile recent FRAND ruling by the same court, Mr Justice Marcus Smith's Optis v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:06 am
One key overlap between Mr Justice Smith's approach in Optis v. [read post]
27 May 2023, 12:23 pm
Optis v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 7:14 am
Smith, a father of two children. [read post]
23 May 2023, 4:57 am
This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
4 May 2023, 5:16 am
The Supreme Court recognized risks of this kind in a 1959 obscenity prosecution against a bookseller, Smith v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:05 pm
In the landmark case of Citizens United v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 8:04 pm
" But NRA v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
” Ashcroft v. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 9:45 am
V. v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 5:42 am
Tarter Smith (an insured) spearheaded the litigation from its inception. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:06 am
This was also an issue for the Singapore High Court in The “STI Orchard” [2022], SGHCR 6 on which Reed Smith has reported here. [read post]
