Search for: "Holder v. Martin"
Results 21 - 40
of 282
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2010, 6:24 am
Holder, No. 09-89, Ralph D. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:21 am
EduCap, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 4:02 am
This morning the CJEU (second chamber) handed down judgement in case C-98/13, Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA,Manufacture des Montres Rolex SAThe point at issue before the CJEU (set out in a series of questions which the court condensed to a single answer) was that, in the scenario where somebody purchased from a non-EU website counterfeit goods (in this case, a fake Rolex), could these be seized by customs, it being apparently common ground that the Customs Regulation… [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 2:44 am
" Since Lockheed's sheets were partially manufactured in Japan, the court ruled that the US has no liability under Section 1498(a).Zoltek has petitioned for a grant of certiorari, arguing that the CAFC decision "strips an entire class of property owners - patent holders - of their Fifth Amendment right to just compensation for the taking of their patent rights. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 3:23 pm
See Dist. of Columbia v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:10 pm
In Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 9:00 am
Martin Justice Blackmun – Herrera v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 5:38 am
Martin v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
Martin, 666 N.E.2d 411 (Ind. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 1:37 pm
Tafas v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 3:45 am
Rivard v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
Martin[i] provides a good example. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 9:42 am
Supreme Court in Bank of American National Trust & Savings Ass’n v. 203 North LaSalle St. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 3:25 am
In April 2022, INTA filed an amicus brief (pdf here) supporting Jack Daniel's petition for en banc rehearing of the BAD SPANIELS decision in VIP Products LLC v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 8:04 am
So, with apologies to any readers who may have been awaiting it with bated [please note correct spelling] breath, here's the story.The judgment referred to above is that of the Second Chamber of the Court of Justice the European Union (CJEU) in Case C‑98/13, Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA, Manufacture des Montres Rolex SA, a request for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret (Supreme Court), Denmark [a big Katpat to the CJEU, in dispensing with an… [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 11:24 am
Supreme Court will vote today whether to accept for review Zoltek Corporation v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 6:30 am
Martin Luther King, Jr., who was assassinated fifty years ago in Memphis, Tennessee. [read post]
30 Aug 2017, 3:02 am
” Or cause to delay a trial [court order in U.S. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 7:45 am
Kogan v Martin is explained brilliantly in this guest Kat post here. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 10:17 am
Holder v. [read post]
