Search for: "Holder v. United States"
Results 21 - 40
of 3,853
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Apr 2009, 11:35 am
The Chief Justice responded: “General Holder, on behalf of the Court, I welcome you as the chief law officer of the United States government and as an officer of this Court. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 11:23 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 11:02 pm
The post Vacatur and United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 9:10 am
Now that the Mardi Gras season is over, the federal criminal defense and immigration defense lawyers in Palm Beach, Broward, and Miami Dade county may want to take a few moments moment to read a newly issued opinion from the United States Supreme Court: Kawashima v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:47 pm
United States, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit became the second federal court of appeals to strike down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) as unconstitutional. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 2:40 pm
Following a string of cases that recently challenged various aspects of copyright law on constitutional grounds, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to the case of Golan v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:46 am
Holder. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:46 am
Holder. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 10:26 am
Holder, No. 10-1211. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 11:50 am
II, defined to include “all persons who can be said to hold an office under the government” in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 1:54 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:43 am
It’s interesting that the United States hasn’t relied on the Elections Clause in its defense of Sections 4(b) and 5. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:11 am
Now up here on the official DOJ website is the "Statement of Attorney General Eric Holder Regarding United States V. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:11 am
Now up here on the official DOJ website is the "Statement of Attorney General Eric Holder Regarding United States V. [read post]
Leiba v. Holder: Aggravated felony bar in INA 212(h) inapplicable to those who were never “admitted”
3 Dec 2012, 6:01 am
Said case is controlling in the states of Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia, and West Virginia but can be used as a persuasive authority throughout the United States. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 1:27 pm
The United States Supreme Court has just issued an immigration related decision that breaths a whisper of common sense back into the interpretation of our United States immigration laws.In Carachuri-Rosendo v. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 8:29 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 3:29 pm
And does the United States take that position today? [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 10:50 am
Carmelina Vera Rojas, No. 10-14662, and United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court, in its 5-4 decision today in Shelby v. [read post]
