Search for: "Holland Scientific, Inc." Results 21 - 40 of 50
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2012, 1:05 pm by lawshucks
According to her LinkedIn Profile, Olivarius’s experience includes (emphasis added): Having initially developed corporate finance skills at Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs, her legal career includes service as General Counsel, CEO and Director of Scientific Programs of a medical foundation with assets valued at over $100 million (in 1991), and as a legal and strategic financial advisor for Perot Systems and Computer Memories, Inc. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 1:12 pm by WIMS
[#Air] GET THE REST OF TODAY'S NEWS (click here)Waste Information & Management Services, Inc. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 2:13 pm by Jon Sham
Schulman, said he heard through the grapevine that Electronic Arts Inc. had programmed a “retro” feature into Madden in which the Ravens’ uniforms bear Bouchat’s symbol. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
By now Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A (1965) is so old as to be thought of as somewhat antediluvian. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:40 am
Case New Holland, Inc., 566 F.3d 1372, 1375 (Fed. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 4:30 am by Mary Giorgi
Interpreting Federal Rule of Evidence 702, Daubert ruled that modern judges now must serve as scientific “gatekeepers,” keeping out scientific testimony that is not “reliable. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
"   At the National Law Journal, Tony Mauro recaps the oral argument in Mohawk Industries Inc. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
New Holland North America, Inc., 440 F.3d 1002, 1005 (8th Cir. 2006) (applying Missouri law); Kinser v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
New Holland North America, Inc., 440 F.3d 1002, 1005 (8th Cir. 2006) (applying Missouri law); Kinser v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
New Holland North America, Inc., 440 F.3d 1002, 1005 (8th Cir. 2006) (applying Missouri law); Kinser v. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
New Holland North America, Inc., 440 F.3d 1002, 1005 (8th Cir. 2006) (applying Missouri law); Kinser v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(ITC 337 Law Blog) Academic perspectives on issues raised in Bilski case (IP Osgoode) Star Scientific teaches a valuable lesson to all IP share investors (IAM) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Appealing BPAI rejections to the Federal Circuit: In re Baggett (nonprecedential) (Patently-O) CAFC: Preliminary injunctions and obviousness in design patent law: Titan Tire Corp v Case New Holland, Inc (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: Post-filing assignment cannot… [read post]