Search for: "Hollywood Motion Picture Trust" Results 21 - 31 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2012, 9:29 am by Andres
Another potentially draconian provision is contained in Art. 24.3, which says: “A Party may provide criminal procedures and penalties in appropriate cases for the unauthorized copying of cinematographic works from a performance in a motion picture exhibition facility generally open to the public. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 5:00 am by Gordon Firemark
 Supposedly, she’s musician, and sends him beautiful pictures of herself and some of her recorded songs. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 9:14 am by Kevin
@changesq (Michael Chang, international business & legal affairs exec at major Hollywood motion picture studio) said Twitter 'reveals the 'human' side of fellow lawyers and execs, helping to develop camaraderie online & off. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:19 am
(IP Spotlight)   US Patents - Decisions ITC: ALJ Charneski denies MVTec’s motion for summary determination of non-infringement in certain machine vision software (337-TA-680) (ITC 337 Law Blog)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Cognex - ALJ Charneski denies MVTec’s motion for summary determination of invalidity in certain machine vision software (337-TA-680) (ITC 337 Law Blog) HTC - HTC launches its own ITC complaint against Apple (Ars… [read post]
14 May 2009, 12:52 pm
The Motion Picture Association of America, which represents Hollywood studios, and others, sued RealNetworks last year, claiming the software is illegal because it circumvents technology designed to prevent copying. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
Here's the Court's outline (as formatted by Deadline Hollywood): 1986-90: Fox acquires motion picture rights in The Watchmen. 1990: Fox enters into a domestic distribution agreement with Largo Entertainment, a joint venture of JVC Entertainment Inc., Golar (Larry Gordon), and BOH, Inc. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Lentz, No. 06-4691 A conviction for interstate kidnapping resulting in the death of defendant's ex-wife is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) whether a jury instruction given by the district court constructively amended the indictment; 2) denial of pre-trial motions to suppress testimony from a jail informant about a murder-for-hire plot; 3) denial of a motion to suppress a recorded telephone conversation between defendant and his counsel in which the murder-for-hire… [read post]