Search for: "Holt v. May"
Results 21 - 40
of 352
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2022, 3:14 pm
From Anonymous Plaintiff 1 v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 3:48 pm
See also Holt v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 10:34 am
… Although the relevant line—how much pressure is too much—may be difficult to discern with precision, we know from Holt v. [read post]
21 Jul 2022, 10:44 am
Applying Gunn v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 10:50 am
Andrew Holt characterizes it as “perhaps the most powerful European state of the Middle Age”. [read post]
27 May 2022, 1:54 pm
Ward, Lester Smith maintains that the Georgia Department of Corrections is not following the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision in Holt v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 1:13 pm
The justices will meet together again during their closed-door conference in Washington on May 12. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
That question arises because a 2015 Supreme Court decision, Holt v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:56 am
In Holt v. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 10:16 am
O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal (2006) (win for religious exemption from the federal drug law banning hoasca, a hallucinogen) and Holt v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 10:29 am
Navy Seals 1-26 v. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 1:50 pm
Dec. 4, 2020); Doe v. [read post]
25 Nov 2021, 6:00 am
So I think on this I would adopt the words of Chief Justice Holt, in the great case of Coggs v Barnard in 1703, when he said: “I have stirred these points, which wiser heads in time may settle. [read post]
3 Aug 2021, 5:00 pm
”[18] The Court discussed Holt v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:00 am
O Centro, which involved a small religious group's use of the hallucinogenic drug hoasca, and Holt v. [read post]
30 Apr 2021, 7:52 am
It may or may not be used for nefarious purposes, and may or may not put a data subject at risk. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 4:07 pm
B. 1703), and this principle “laid down . . . by Lord Holt” was followed “in many subsequent cases,” Embrey v. [read post]
13 Feb 2021, 10:54 am
The conventional wisdom may be that Justice Gorsuch is more likely to be a "cross-over" vote than Justice Alito, but the latter authored an important RLUIPA decision (Holt v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 5:19 am
Holt, COA19-986 (N.C. [read post]