Search for: "Horsemen, Inc."
Results 21 - 30
of 30
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2014, 11:38 am
That case was Medtronic Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:15 am
New Jersey Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:10 pm
New Jersey Thoroughbred Horsemen’s Association, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 8:50 am
IPNews® - L’Oreal USA Inc., a maker of fragrances using the Polo Ralph Lauren logo, claims that the U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 3:11 am
Secret Memo Tells All - http://bit.ly/qgTTf1 (David Kravets) Why Twitter is Important for the Financial Professional - http://bit.ly/nGuCB4 (Mike Langford) Wrong Way: Technology and People Can Crash During Trials - http://bit.ly/qLfJ6i (Robyn Weisman) Twitter Hashtags of the Week #eDiscovery #eDisclosure #Masters11 #EDI2011 Vendor Views Industry Landscape AccessData® Announces Computer Forensics Software Replacement Program - http://bit.ly/oNYbcI (Business Wire) Altep, Inc. to… [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 12:17 pm
In that opinion, the DOL found that a health benefit plan established by the Pennsylvania Division, Horsemen’s Benevolent & Protective Association Inc. to provide benefits to individuals associated with thoroughbread racing at Pennsylvania National Turf Club was not an employee welfare benefit plan within the meaning of ERISA section 3(1). [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 10:06 am
You see, in 2005, in Diversicare General Partner Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 3:03 pm
Held: (1) Allegations that the defendants conspired to orchestrate an illegal boycott require more proof to survive summary judgment than e-mails informing defendants that other parties to a consent agreement were withdrawing their consent. (2) Contract provisions that provide that the contract can be terminated if certain governmental approvals or consents are not "private rights of action" to enforce provisions of legislative enactments, but are, instead, contractual provisions.Facts: … [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 6:19 pm
Bennett.Held: A party’s mere acquiescence in another party’s illegal scheme is sufficient to create a conspiracy in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act.Facts: Cloverleaf Enterprises, Inc. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:07 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITIntellectual PropertyClothier's Polo Player Logo Not Infringed by Polo Group's ‘Double Horsemen Mark's on Licensed Clothing PRL USA Holdings Inc., plaintiff-appellant v. [read post]
