Search for: "Housing Authority of the City and County of San Francisco v. All Persons"
Results 21 - 40
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco, he notes that the court has recognized that the amendment’s purpose “is to safeguard the privacy and security of individuals against arbitrary invasions by governmental officials. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:21 am
City and County of San Francisco, 93 Cal. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:12 pm
Indeed, in a December 2019 Ninth Circuit ruling, City & Cty. of San Francisco v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
"Political Opinion," Expressly Including a Broad Range of Views: Maryland Counties Harford, Howard, and Prince George's Counties (Md.) ban discrimination in public accommodations and housing based on "political opinion," defined (with immaterial variation among the ordinances) as "the opinions of persons relating to government, or the conduct of government; or related to political parties authorized to participate in primary… [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
The cost of gasoline, travel, staff pay, printed materials, and food for events all affect the bottom lines of campaigns. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
County of Butte v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
For example, the cities of Aspen and Boulder and the city and County of Denver each had enacted ordinances which banned discrimination in many transactions and activities, including housing, employment, education, public accommodations, and health and welfare services. [read post]
14 May 2023, 7:07 pm
(Yu v. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 10:45 am
This post was authored by Peter J. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 3:00 am
City & Cty. of San Francisco (9th Cir. 2020) 952 F.3d 1157. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
That alternative is backed by a diverse group that includes The Bay Institute, the Contra Costa Council, Defenders of Wildlife, Environmental Entrepreneurs, the Planning and Conservation League, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the San Diego County Water Authority, Alameda County Water District, Contra Costa Water District, East Bay Municipal Utility District, Otay Water District, the City of San Diego and the San… [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am
City and County of San Francisco, California, 20-1212, concerns when a takings claim becomes ripe for review. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:10 pm
Louis, No. 073673 In an action arising out of a municipal sign ordinance, grant of defendant's motion to dismiss is reversed and remanded where district court's summary dismissal of all the plaintiffs' claims based on the defendants' absence of authority missed the gravamen of plaintiffs' section 1983 claim, that defendants' purported exercise of authority infringed upon their constitutional rights. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
County of San Diego (September 28, 2018, case no. [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:19 am
City and County of San Francisco 14-704 Issue: Whether San Francisco’s attempt to deprive law-abiding individuals of immediate access to operable handguns in their own homes is any more constitutional than the District of Columbia’s invalidated effort to do the same. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 10:37 am
Several major California cities, including Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego, Oakland, and San Jose have already approved regulations permitting sales within their jurisdictions. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 11:14 am
Protect Niles v. [read post]
