Search for: "Housing Authority v. Peters" Results 21 - 40 of 673
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
The Data Protection and Digital Information Bill has passed through the House of Commons and will now proceed to the House of Lords for consideration. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:21 am by centerforartlaw
So this was different from the troop of Charles V, Holy Roman Emperor, looting during the 16th century. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
One month after sending the Fourteenth Amendment to the states, the House of Representatives firmly rejected any constitutional distinction between the phrases “office under” and an “office of” as they were used in various constitutional provisions, including Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment, which declares persons holding “offices of the United States” are subject to disqualification from “offices under the United States. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Judge Says Peter Navarro Can’t Use Privilege as Defense in Contempt Case MSN – Paul Duggan (Washington Post) | Published: 8/30/2023 A judge ruled Peter Navarro, a Trump White House adviser charged with criminal contempt of Congress, cannot argue to a jury that he was barred by executive privilege from providing testimony and documents to the House committee investigating the attack on the U.S. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Johnson v Watts 2023 NY Slip Op 32825(U) August 14, 2023 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 502133/2018 Judge: Peter P. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 12:06 pm by Legal Aggregate
Supreme Court amicus brief they filed, along with scholars Christopher DeMuth and Peter Wallison, in Biden v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:46 am by Frank Cranmer
: on two significant decisions on the legal recognition of same-sex couples: Buhuceanu and Others v Romania and Maymulakhin and Markiv v Ukraine. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
  Check out our new addition below: A curated repository of deposition transcripts from the House Select Committee. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm by David Pocklington
They were that a marriage must be carried out in church after the publication of banns, or the obtaining of a licence from the ecclesiastical authorities (i.e. in accordance with the Canons). [read post]
18 Jun 2023, 11:10 am by Stuart Kaplow
In this instance, 16 young people from across Montana, who were between 2 and 18 years old when the case was filed in 2020, brought their constitutional climate lawsuit, Held v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:29 am by CMS
The leading authority for legal proximity is Alcock v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police  [1992] 1 AC 310 (‘Alcock’). [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Guest Contributor
The Arkansas Supreme Court explained the effect of fraudulent inducement in Wal-Mart Stores v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:36 am by Peter J. Sluka
”  Several years ago, Peter Mahler explored the BCL 1118 election in the aptly-titled post, A Deep Dive into the Election to Purchase in Dissolution Proceedings. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
Like the Convocation House and the Divinity School, the University Chancellor’s Court is licensed [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
No one better than Sandy and his co-author, Cynthia Levinson has exposed the undemocratic features of the constitution’s structures, explaining this disjunction between people’s preferences and what law can enact.[15]  One question that should animate contemporary civics education class is how, despite such majority and super majority views, such policies are ensnared in political opposition. [read post]