Search for: "Houston v. Doe"
Results 21 - 40
of 1,773
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2022, 2:00 pm
Houston, 2022 WL 395309 (M.D. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 5:40 am
City of Houston v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 8:16 am
Co. v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 12:13 pm
§ 31.002; Sivley v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 10:25 pm
-Houston [1st Dist.] 1995, pet. denied) (quoting "Moore" Burger, Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 9:24 am
In a case following a familiar trade-secret set of facts, on April 28, 2020, the Texas First District Court of Appeals in Houston reversed the trial court’s grant of a motion to dismiss under the Texas Citizens Participation Act (“TCPA”) in National Signs, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 8:34 am
In Leslie v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 12:22 pm
A Houston Court of Appeals in Queen et al. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 5:33 am
Schwinn, University of Illinois Chicago School of Law The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments this morning in Houston Community College System v. [read post]
3 Apr 2008, 12:40 am
In Service Employees International Union v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 2:56 pm
Texas does not have the kind of rule that Arizona does, categorically precluding any ineffective assistance claims on direct appeal, which the Supreme Court said is what triggers Martinez's narrow exception to the general Coleman v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 9:16 am
In Jabri v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:24 pm
Ben Cohen (The Charles Hamilton Houston Institute for Race and Justice and The Justice Center's Capital Appeals Project) have posted Redemption Song: Graham v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 10:21 am
Johnson’s lawsuit against the City of Houston’s illegal sanctuary policy will now continue (Johnson v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 1:44 pm
[Post by Jake McGowan, with comments from Eric] Rogers v. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 5:37 am
Here is the complaint: Speech First v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 3:03 am
The case is Saint Elizabeth Medical Center Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 2:02 pm
The provision does not apply to private employers and does not related to the authority under “emergency use authorization. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
Established precedent from the Supreme Court of Texas says that it does. [read post]
9 Nov 2017, 6:31 am
Established precedent from the Supreme Court of Texas says that it does. [read post]
