Search for: "Howes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections"
Results 21 - 40
of 526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am
How to resolve this impasse? [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 4:11 am
W (Algeria) (FC) and BB (Algeria) (FC) and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8 – read judgment The court is entitled to make an order for a witness to give evidence before the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) in such a way that the identity of the witness and the substance of the evidence remains confidential. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
How to resolve this impasse? [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
How judges receive it remains to be seen. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am
RU (Bangladesh) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 651 - Read Judgment Further to our recent post on the deportation of foreign criminals, the matter has once again come to the attention of the Court of Appeal. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:56 pm
The Department also proposes to clarify language in DWD chapter 140 regarding hearing records, Department assistance for people with disabilities at hearings, and to correct minor and technical language in DWD chapter 140. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
In a decision handed down on 24 June 2016 (TLT and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] EWHC 2217 (QB)) Mitting J ordered the Home Office to pay six claimants a combined total of £39,500 for the misuse of private information and breaches of the Data Protection Act (“DPA”) 1998 arising from the publication online of a spreadsheet. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:34 pm
However, it also references the “Department of Corrections” (Art. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 12:10 pm
Trump v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 9:00 pm
Five years later, in Franklin v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am
If lawyers at the State Department decide that Wittes and McCants are correct and the Brotherhood just doesn’t satisfy the statutory criteria for designation as an FTO, as the New York Times reported last night they may now believe, could President Trump’s Treasury still take action against the group? [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:09 pm
In light of that, it asked the Court to find that the statutory scheme was ambiguous, giving the Commerce Department discretion (and presumably a mandate) to liquidate at the lower, "correct" rate. [read post]
4 May 2009, 11:25 am
The North Carolina Supreme Court issued its ruling in North Carolina Department of Corrections v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 6:26 am
But is that the correct answer? [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 6:58 am
In 2010, the Secretary made a “technical correction” without further notice and comment in a final rule. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm
New Mexico Taxation & Revenue Department (Taxation) Mathieu v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:06 am
The DOL corrected this error by revising 29 C.F.R 826.90(b) to provide that advanced notice of EFML is required as soon as practicable. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:02 am
” They are correct. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:26 am
R (on the application of Cart) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Respondent); R (on the application of MR (Pakistan)) (FC) (Appellant) v The Upper Tribunal (Immigration & Asylum Chamber) and Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 28, 22/6/2011 – read judgment; press summary here Unappealable decisions of the Upper Tribunal are still subject to judicial review by the High Court, but… [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
" Justice Gabriel is correct. [read post]
