Search for: "Howes v. Secretary, Department of Corrections"
Results 21 - 40
of 526
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
This "fix" was used when Senator Hillary Clinton was nominated as Secretary of State. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 1:35 am
IPSO have published guidance for journalists and editors on how they should display corrections and adjudications on digital articles and social media posts. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Secretary of State, should dismiss South Africa’s case as “meritless,” arguing that it “distracts the world” from efforts to find a lasting solution to the conflict. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 5:04 am
” How then is it possible that the Department of Commerce in these cases received Chevron deference given that the modern caselaw on Chevron—in particular, United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
IPSO Resolution Statement – 21032-23 Collins v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediation 16764-23 Loftus, Brame, Shearly-Sanders & McLeod v hadleigh.nub.news, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction Statements in open court and apologies We are not aware of any statements in open court or apologies in the last two weeks. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
We cite the corpus linguistics amicus brief written by James Heilpern in Lucia v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 3:05 am
Newspaper Journalism and regulation IPSO ordered the Daily Mirror to publish a correction after Understanding Animal Research (UAR) brought a complaint in relation to an article which claimed, without verification, that testing medicine on animals did not predict how they would work in humans. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
The recent statements from the Culture Secretary about the increase to the license fee are “only the latest in a long series of political attacks on independent public media. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 12:41 pm
" Justice Gabriel is correct. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
IPSO 18075-23 Singh v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18301-23 Taylor v The Herald on Sunday, 1 Accuracy 2021, Breach – sanction: publication of correction 19677-23 A complainant v The Daily Telegraph, 3 Harassment (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19741-23 Dikme v eveningnews24.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction:… [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
On 22 November 2023, the Court of Appeal (Bean, Andrew and Lewis LLJ) handed down judgment in Department for Business and Trade v Information Commissioner [2023] EWCA Civ 1378. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:12 am
In this post, Shabbir Bokhari, a paralegal in the Litigation & Arbitration team at CMS comments on the decision from the Supreme Court in R (AAA and Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42 which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
On 1 and 2 November 2023, the UK Supreme court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) heard the appeal in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
The Supreme Court is to decide whether the Court of Appeal was correct to strike out the claim as an abuse of process. [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
SeeEisner v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
That happens to be the correct legal result. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 11:25 am
Department of Justice. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
