Search for: "Hudson v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 1,817
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2023, 10:14 am by Robin Happel
Under the Central Hudson test, commercial speech is protected if it concerns lawful activity and is not misleading. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:04 am by Ben Sperry
Then, applying Central Hudson, the court first found that protecting children is clearly enough to satisfy a substantial state interest, because it would likely even be a compelling state interest. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 3:30 pm by Stephen J. Natoli
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently issued a pivotal decision in the case of State v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Unknown
Under Central Hudson, a regulation must directly advance substantial government interest and be no more extensive than necessary to serve that interest. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]