Search for: "Hughes v. Cooper" Results 21 - 40 of 155
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2020, 12:45 am by CMS
They tend to be driven forward by claimant law firms working in cooperation with litigation funders. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Dupate v Latvia ([2020] ECHR 819) the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights held that the publication of covertly taken photographs of the partner of a politician leaving hospital with her newborn baby was a violation of her Article 8 rights. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
We have not yet achieved the level of cooperation necessary to strengthen the entire Internet ecosystem. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 3:00 am by Michael Lumer
But in 2005, another mobbed up buddy began cooperating, and suddenly the jig was up. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Hughes thinks that TRIPs was a big package, not one-sided, and the overall package brought good and bad. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 2:02 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Advocate General representing the Commissioners of HMRC v K E Entertainments Ltd (Scotland), heard 29 April 2020 Stoffel & Co v Grondona, heard 5 May 2020 Ecila Henderson (A Protected Party, by her litigation friend, The Official Solicitor) v Dorset Healthcare Trust, heard Monday 11- Tuesday 12 May 2020 Mastercard Incorporated & Ors v Walter Hugh Merricks CBE, heard Wednesday 13- Thursday 14 May 2020 AP v Her Majesty’s Advocate… [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 7:16 pm
--Hughes v The Home Depot, Inc, DNJ: After being subjected to threats of violence and verbal abuse, a Home Depot employee who described herself as “intersexed” or a “partial hermaphrodite” proffered sufficient evidence to defeat the home improvement store’s summary judgment motion on her hostile work environment sexual harassment claim. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm by ernst
”   A scholars' brief on "the History and Original Meaning of the Fourth Amendment as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioner in Carpenter v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
The EFF argued that the embedding of Section 230 into NAFTA/USMCA “could help roll back the precedent set in the Google v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
Ingenious Media and Patrick McKenna were represented by Hugh Tomlinson QC and Jessica Simor QC (both of Matrix Chambers), instructed by Olswang LLP. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 4:59 pm
He invoked the Federal Constitution's privilege against self-incrimination and refused to cooperate. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am by Frank Cranmer
As was said in Salvesen v Riddell 2013 SC (UKSC) 236 (Lord Hope at para 57), if such an order is made, it may be appropriate to give permission to the Lord Advocate to return to the court for any further orders under section 102(2)(b) as may be required. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 6:16 am by Susan Brenner
Hughes, 353 N.C. 200, 539 S.E.2d 625 (North Carolina Supreme Court 2000). [read post]