Search for: "Hughes v. Sullivan"
Results 21 - 40
of 55
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm
Monge v. [read post]
21 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm
An Iowa high court opinion, State v. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Such an error, under Sullivan v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 5:20 pm
Unenforceability in the United States The Judge noted that, since 1964 when the Supreme Court of the United States decided New York Times v Sullivan 376 US 254 (1964), there has not been a single reported State or Federal decision in which a foreign defamation judgment has been recognised and enforced in the United States [89]. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
Research and Resources “Institutional Actors in New York Times v Sullivan”, Paul Horwitz, Georgia Law Review, Forthcoming. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:10 am
McAlpine v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 11:10 am
McAlpine v. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
Claimants included the Duchess of York, James Blunt, Christopher Eccleston,Uri Geller and Hugh Grant, as reported by Press Gazette. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 3:58 am
Wiseman v Sullivan. 4. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
There was an Inforrm post by Hugh Tomlinson QC dealing with this contribution to the debate. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am
On 12 December 2012, the Court of Appeal (Arden and Lloyd-Jones LJJ and Tugendhat J) handed down judgment in Cammish v Hughes ([2012] EWCA Civ 1655). [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am
http://bit.ly/QeYSVx (Michael Schmidt) Proper Wildcard Searching: Why You Should Give a Dam* – http://bit.ly/Pjc34V (Doug Austin) Radically Reinvent The Review Process - http://bit.ly/Q2x6LK (George Kiersted) Rambus ‘Shred Days’ Ruled Spoliation, $397M Judgment Reduced - http://bit.ly/Pn446U (Jan Wolfe) Reasonable Particularity And Social Network eDiscovery - http://bit.ly/P0Kqxr (IT-Lex) State Judge Imposes $300K Sanction On… [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 5:52 pm
The only one of the impressive range of speeches was that given by Hugh Grant – where he called on European Union regulators to restrict the influence of media moguls such as Rupert Murdoch. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 5:35 am
Sullivan etc.: “the adults in the room know that if you say negative things about public officials you’re going to get sued. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
PCC staff are available at all times to advise members of the public further, and to offer practical, immediate assistance.” Since last week’s round up there are a number of “resolved” PCC complaints to report: Mr Julian Assange v The Observer The Observer, clause 1, 09/03/2012; Mrs Christine Hemming v Sunday Mercury, clause 1, 08/03/2012; Mrs Carol Mlatem v South Wales Argus, clause 3, 08/03/2012; Ms Pamela Fenton v Sunday Mail, clause 1,… [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
Half-day seminar on legal knowledge in a digital age, with speakers including Geoffrey Robertson QC, Hugh Tomlinson QC, Heather Brooke, Mike Dodd and Adam Wagner. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 4:04 pm
The same day the Court of Appeal (the Master of the Rolls, Sullivan and Black LJJ) will hear an application for permission to appeal in the case of Hutcheson v Popdog Ltd. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
”[6] (b) Mr Hugh Tomlinson QC: the need for appropriate remedies as well as protection of bloggers If agreement of the kind described by Mr Justice Eady could be reached concerning the applicable law, why not also agreement about applicable remedies? [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:05 am
Sofa Entertainment Inc. v. [read post]
