Search for: "Humphries v. Humphries" Results 21 - 40 of 240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2015, 10:44 am
Judge Owens writes a strong opinion this morning. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 4:03 am by INFORRM
Presenters often appear to be ill-briefed and insufficiently armed with the facts necessary to challenge assertions made by interviewees in live interviews, reflecting not just pressure on them but a lack of understanding by programme researchers and producers He also pointed to ‘evidence of a misunderstanding of the political process in the EU’, drawing attention in particular to written evidence submitted by the Labour Party which stated that ‘too often it seems that you report… [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
By Gary Cox, Craig Humphris and Donna Meredith -- In the decision of Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 50 (order), the High Court of Australia, Australia's supreme court, confirmed that methods of medical treatment are a "manner of manufacture" and therefore represent a patentable invention in Australia. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 5:27 am by Zachary Spilman
Humphries, 71 M.J. 209, slip op. at 21, n.10 (C.A.A.F. 2012) (citing United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 8:48 am by Brett McDonnell
One of my favorite examples of this is one of the classic old CSR cases, Medical Committee for Human Rights v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:08 pm by Zachary Spilman
In The Hazard of Humphries, I discussed how CAAF’s decision in United States v. [read post]