Search for: "Humphries v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2010, 7:07 am
Humphries (09-350) and Harrington v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 6:55 am
Humphries, and Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 10:16 am
Giuffre and Humphries v. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 3:15 pm
Carmelo Guiffre (A-72-10) (066969) & Bobbie Humphries v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 9:33 pm
CAAF also granted review in United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 12:37 pm
In Los Angeles County v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:32 pm
Humphries, in which the Court held that 42 U.S.C. [read post]
26 May 2008, 12:20 pm
Humphries and Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 12:52 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 3:46 pm
CAAF heard oral argument last week in the Article 62 appeal case of United States v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 8:15 am
Supreme Court today, in CBOCS West Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:39 am
Nancy Urizar: Supreme Court Of The United States To Hear Oral Arguments In Patent Exhaustion Case Andy Lucas & Robyn Chatwood: Intellectual Property Rights In A Virtual World Deanna Okun: US Must Bolster Fight With China Over Intellectual Property Rights Matthew Humphries: Sony Patent Wants Every Gadget To Double As A Wireless Charger Evan Engstrom: In Apple v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 7:51 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 7:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 9:16 pm
Contents include:Graham Dutfield, TK unlimited: The emerging but incoherent international law of traditional knowledge protection Morten Walløe Tvedt & Ellen-Marie Forsberg, The room for ethical considerations in patent law applied to biotechnology Rami Olwan, The ratification and implementation of the Marrakesh Treaty for visually impaired persons in the Arab Gulf States Olga Gurgula, Monopoly v. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 12:22 pm
United States/Gould v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 1:38 pm
Guiffre (A-72-10) (a consumer fraud case) and Humphries v. [read post]
27 May 2008, 7:03 am
Humphries (06-1431), decided by a 7-2 vote, and Gomez-Perez v. [read post]