Search for: "I.S. V. STATE" Results 21 - 40 of 17,478
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2024, 5:50 am by Berke Gursoy
This is a high but not impossible bar to meet, as shown in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 5:20 pm by Bill Marler
 E. coli O157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and… [read post]
8 Jun 2024, 8:33 am by familoo
A parent is deemed as being able to be involved without putting the child at risk of harm i.e. they can rely on the presumption, ‘unless there is some evidence before the court in the particular proceedings to suggest that involvement of that parent in the child’s life would put the child at risk of suffering harm whatever the form of the involvement’. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
For further information regarding this act, contact Liskow attorneys Greg Johnson, Clare Bienvenu, Emily von Qualen and Colin North and visit our Environmental practice page. 1In an April 1 letter to a Louisiana Senator, the EPA Region 6 Administrator stated the following: “EPA has concerns that the [CAMRA] may preclude the use of any credible evidence to determine compliance under the [CAA] and may conflict with Louisiana’s federally approved Title V and… [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
First, following Curistan v Times Newspapers [2009] QB 231, qualified privilege operates so that the relevant privileged words are ignored for defamation purposes, at least as far as meaning is concerned, except insofar as they provide context for non-privileged words [56]. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am by Michael Oykhman
The case of R v ML, 2021 NBCA 27 also stated that the actus reus is made out where a “reasonable person aware of the circumstances would perceive the words as a threat of death or bodily harm”. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:31 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” Finally, the Court ruled that ownership and management of the Maiden Lane property through multiple separate entities was not fatal to Kefalas’s joint venture claim, writing: As the plaintiff stated a cause of action based on a joint venture agreement with regard to the Maiden Lane property transaction, the plaintiff has standing to bring this action in his individual capacity, as he alleged that the corporations were mere conduits (see Rinaldi v Casale, 13… [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:00 am by Rogier Bartels
In R v Gul, it noted “that insurgents in non-international armed conflicts do not enjoy combatant immunity” (para. 50). [read post]