Search for: "ICON HEALTH V OCTANE FITNESS"
Results 21 - 40
of 188
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2018, 7:15 am
ICON Health & Fitness rapidly approaches. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 7:15 am
ICON Health & Fitness rapidly approaches. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 5:00 am
Icon Health & Fitness, 134 S. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 4:09 am
The statute provides that the court may award attorneys’ fees to the prevailing party “in exceptional cases” (see Octane Fitness, LLC v Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., __ US __, __, 134 S Ct 1749, 1756 [2014]). [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:27 am
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:23 pm
Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 5:59 am
ICON Health and Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 4:59 am
ICON Health and Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 9:59 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. and Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 9:18 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 9:18 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 7:17 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 7:15 am
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 9:18 am
Icon Health and Fitness altered the fee analysis under the Lanham Act, vacating the panel decision. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm
The United States Supreme Court’s 2014 opinion in a patent case, Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 1:26 pm
The United States Supreme Court’s 2014 opinion in a patent case, Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 4:26 am
Icon Health & Fitness Inc., 134 S. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 10:02 pm
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 S. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 5:04 am
ICON Health and Fitness and Highmark Inc. v. [read post]