Search for: "IDE v STATE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTIC" Results 21 - 40 of 1,566
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2024, 1:21 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Department of Justice's petition for a writ of mandamus seeking dismissal of Juliana v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 1:18 pm by Melissa Tremblay
Department of Justice and the whistleblowers’ bar.[1] In its U.S. ex rel. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm by Marty Lederman
 Moreover, at least three important precedents--United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 12:36 am by centerforartlaw
The European Court of Human Rights in the decision Bayev and others v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
One need look no further than last week’s sentencing of Samuel Bankman-Fried to see the impact of noncompliance.[12] In advance of the sentencing, the Department of Justice filed hundreds of victim statements with the court.[13] The victim statements reflect the incredibly broad cross-section of people who were harmed by the fraud that Bankman-Fried was convicted of: single parents, retirees, young people, grandparents. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Origin and Meaning of the Anti-Power-Concentration Principle In Seila Law v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Preclearance by the Justice Department under the Voting Rights Act’s Section 5 had the biggest impact until it was demolished by the Supreme Court in Shelby County. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
In the past, we have cited Justice Story's analysis in Section 791 to show there are good early American sources that put forward the same views we have put forward. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]