Search for: "IDT Corp" Results 21 - 40 of 42
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2013, 3:46 am by Madhulika Vishwanathan
IDT Corp, Judge Mayer argues that “"[t]he obligation to determine what type of discovery is sought to be patented" so as to determine whether it falls within the ambit of section 101 "must precede the determination of whether that discovery is, in fact, new or obvious. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 1:58 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To determine timeliness, we consider whether plaintiff’s complaint must, as a matter of law, be read to allege damages suffered so early as to render the claim time-barred” IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132,139 [2009]. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the appellant's counterclaims against those defendants were time-barred (see CPLR 213[1], [7]; 214[4], [6]; IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d 132, 139; North Fork Preserve, Inc. v Kaplan, 31 AD3d 403, 405). [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 1:35 am
Borden East River Realty LLC NEW YORK COUNTYCivil Practice Leave Granted to Amend Complaint a Second Time to Add Claims Against Morgan Stanley IDT Corp. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2009, 2:29 pm
IDT made the first $1 million payment, but then stopped paying on the debt. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 2:02 pm
CIVIL PROCEDURE, COMMUNICATIONS LAW, CONTRACTS, INJURY AND TORT LAW IDT Corp. v. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 7:48 am
American Shale Oil LLC, a subsidiary of IDT Corp, will help the lab study whether the oil shale will be able to permanently store the carbon dioxide. [read post]
2 May 2008, 1:03 am
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, Defendant-Appellant NEW YORK COUNTYBusiness Law Court Finds Corporate Claims to be Third Party Spoliation Claims, Not Cognizable IDT Corp. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 11:05 am
According to Newsday.com, a jury has awarded $10.5 million to internet executive Alfred West in his suit to enforce a handwritten agrement with IDT Corp. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 1:23 am
Ruben Luciano, defendant-appellant NEW YORK COUNTY Civil Practice Leave to Serve Amended Complaint Does Not Moot Defendants' Appeal From Original Complaint IDT Corp. v. [read post]