Search for: "IN RE: ADOPTION OF B. C. F." Results 21 - 40 of 1,035
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
C. 20543,pio@supremecourt.gov, of any typographical or other formal errors.SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATESNo. 23–719DONALD J. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 4:40 am by privacylawyer
 (a) intimate content communicated without consent;(b) content that sexually victimizes a child or revictimizes a survivor;(c) content that induces a child to harm themselves;(d) content used to bully a child;(e) content that foments hatred;(f) content that incites violence; and(g) content that incites violent extremism or terrorism. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am by Federica Paddeu
General Assembly recognised Russian responsibility and encouraged the creation of an international compensation mechanism as well as a register of damage (A/RES/ES-11/5). [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:15 pm by Administrator
Thus, we would not adopt the approach suggested in Jennings in this case. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 7:53 am by Dan Farber
  They’re all subsections of § 102(2), which makes it all the stranger that no one noticed: Subsection C(iii). [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:53 am by Simon Lester
To that end, a Party shall not adopt or maintain measures which prohibit or restrict the cross-border transfer of information set out in paragraph 1 by: (a) requiring the use of computing facilities or network elements in the territory of the Party for information processing, including by requiring the use of computing facilities or network elements that are certified or approved in the territory of the Party;(b) requiring the localisation of information in the territory of the… [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 4:53 am by Simon Lester
To that end, a Party shall not adopt or maintain measures which prohibit or restrict the cross-border transfer of information set out in paragraph 1 by: (a) requiring the use of computing facilities or network elements in the territory of the Party for information processing, including by requiring the use of computing facilities or network elements that are certified or approved in the territory of the Party;(b) requiring the localisation of information in the territory of the… [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 12:29 pm by ALBERTO HUAPAYA OLIVARES
La República del Perú la aprobó por Resolución Legislativa N° 31386 del 30 de diciembre de 2021 y ratificó mediante Decreto Supremo N° 003-2022-RE del 7 de febrero de 2022. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:54 am by Simon Lester
To that end, a Party shall not adopt or maintain measures which prohibit or restrict the cross-border transfer of information set out in paragraph 1 by: (a) requiring the use of computing facilities or network elements in the territory of the Party for information processing, including by requiring the use of computing facilities or network elements that are certified or approved in the territory of the Party;(b) requiring the localisation of information in the territory of the… [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:54 am by Simon Lester
To that end, a Party shall not adopt or maintain measures which prohibit or restrict the cross-border transfer of information set out in paragraph 1 by: (a) requiring the use of computing facilities or network elements in the territory of the Party for information processing, including by requiring the use of computing facilities or network elements that are certified or approved in the territory of the Party;(b) requiring the localisation of information in the territory of the… [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 8:30 am
Stanley), Brazil (Celio Hiratuka), the Caribbean (Jevon Minto, Chevano Baker and Noel Young), Central America ( Rafael Arias-Achio and Rafael Arias Ramírez), Chile (Dorotea López, Andrés Bórquez, and Juan E. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Rule 9(b) does require particularized pleadings in fraud actions, but again Rule 9 is inapplicable to Section 11 (which is not a fraud cause of action).[12] Particularized pleading is the exception, not the rule. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:37 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Condition 22 provided that if such circumstances occurred, Cal-Am would apply to County to extend the idle period, obtain a new use permit for adaptive re-use of the site, restore the site to the extent feasible, and/or implement a feasible alternative for site use and/or restoration. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Section 1112(b), unless it is filed “in good faith” (with the burden being on the debtor to show this). [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
       (c)  The responsible development and use of AI require a commitment to supporting American workers. [read post]